<\/p>\n
Eski koyu \u015feriat\u00e7\u0131 \u015fimdi PKK u\u015fa\u011f\u0131 BDP’li Altan Tan CNN T\u00fcrk Televizyonunda, MHP’yi kastederek, “Erbakan, eli kanl\u0131 katillerle se\u00e7im ittifak\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in o partiden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131”<\/i><\/strong> b\u00f6b\u00fcrlenerek anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Oysa \u015fimdi kendisi on binlerce bebek, \u00e7ocuk, kad\u0131n masum insan\u0131n katillerinin himayesine s\u0131\u011f\u0131nmaktan utanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Hem “Y\u0131llarca PKK’ya hizmet etmi\u015f ve zahmet \u00e7ekmi\u015f insanlar varken neden seni \u0130mral\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerine \u00f6zellikle katt\u0131lar?”<\/strong> diye sormak laz\u0131md\u0131. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc bu heyetleri haz\u0131rlayan malum merkezler, kendi has adamlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, \u00f6yle herkese g\u00fcven duymazlard\u0131. Acaba Altan Tan’\u0131 dinsiz ve kom\u00fcnist \u00d6calan’\u0131n postac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015ferefine, \u0130slami gelene\u011finden dolay\u0131 m\u0131, yoksa genlerinin hat\u0131r\u0131na m\u0131 lay\u0131k bulmu\u015flard\u0131. Evet, Siyonist Yahudiler nazar\u0131nda Erbakan’a sata\u015fmak kadar hi\u00e7bir tav\u0131r puan kazand\u0131rmazd\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n Almanya’n\u0131n Bremen kentine giden MHP \u0130zmir Milletvekili ve Meclis Grup Ba\u015fkan Vekili Oktay Vural Mercedes i\u015f\u00e7ileri i\u00e7in d\u00fczenlenen seminere kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. 200 dolay\u0131nda T\u00fcrk i\u015f\u00e7inin haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu seminerde konu\u015fan Vural, T\u00fcrkiye’deki siyasi geli\u015fmeler hakk\u0131nda bilgi aktarm\u0131\u015f, sonunda soru cevap b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu b\u00f6l\u00fcmde bir gurbet\u00e7inin aya\u011fa kalkarak Oktay Vural’a <\/span>“Abdullah \u00d6calan yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda iktidarda siz vard\u0131n\u0131z, neden asmad\u0131n\u0131z?<\/strong>” <\/span>sorusu \u00fczerine, \u00e7antas\u0131ndan bir kitap\u00e7\u0131k \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131p baz\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmler okuyan Vural, <\/span>\u201c\u00d6calan’\u0131n idam\u0131na 1997 y\u0131l\u0131nda Tansu \u00c7iller ile Necmettin Erbakan’\u0131n \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi’yle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 11 nolu protokol\u00fcn\u00fcn engel oldu\u011fu\u201d<\/span> iddias\u0131n\u0131 ortaya atm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. <\/span><\/p>\n Vural \u015fu a\u00e7\u0131klamay\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131 “15 \u015eubat 1999 tarihinde ter\u00f6rist ba\u015f\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye’ye getirildi. Zaman zaman Ba\u015fbakan diyor ya, sizin elinize getirildi de siz asmad\u0131n\u0131z. \u00d6calan 31 May\u0131s 1999’da 2 nolu Devlet G\u00fcvenlik Mahkemesi’nde yarg\u0131lanmaya ba\u015fland\u0131. 29 Haziran’da \u00f6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Yarg\u0131tay 9’uncu ceza dairesi de 25 Kas\u0131m 1999’da idam cezas\u0131n\u0131 oy birli\u011fiyle onad\u0131. Bundan \u00f6nce Say\u0131n Tansu \u00c7iller ve Say\u0131n Erbakan taraf\u0131ndan 11 nolu protokol imzaland\u0131. 11 nolu protokolle Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi’ne bireysel ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 tan\u0131d\u0131 ve bizim i\u00e7 hukukumuzun bir par\u00e7as\u0131 halini ald\u0131. Bu bireysel ba\u015fvuru yapanlar hakk\u0131nda icrai faaliyetine girmeden \u00f6nce Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi’nin karar\u0131 beklenmesi laz\u0131md\u0131. Bu protokol 1997 y\u0131l\u0131nda imzaland\u0131. Bu protokolle ter\u00f6rist ba\u015f\u0131 mahkemeye ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131 elde etti ve bunu kulland\u0131. Mahkemede davay\u0131 kabul etti ve idam cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz edilmemesi i\u00e7in ad\u0131m at\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlatt\u0131. Uluslararas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme imzalam\u0131\u015fs\u0131n, yarg\u0131 yetkisini tan\u0131m\u0131\u015fs\u0131n, mahkemede diyor ki ben bu yetkiyi kullan\u0131ncaya kadar idam\u0131 uygulama. Bu protokolde say\u0131n Abdullah G\u00fcl’\u00fcn de imzas\u0131 var. Bir mahkeme s\u00fcreci peki ne yapaca\u011f\u0131z?”<\/i><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Oktay Vural\u2019\u0131n bu as\u0131ls\u0131z iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00e7arp\u0131tmalar\u0131n\u0131, Sabataist h\u0131n\u00e7lar\u0131na sosyalistlik k\u0131l\u0131f\u0131 ge\u00e7iren Odatv. (11.01.2013) hemen d\u00f6rt elle sar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve Erbakan\u2019\u0131 su\u00e7lama f\u0131rsat\u0131 yakalam\u0131\u015f olman\u0131n \u015feytani heyecan\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekmi\u015f gibi yaz\u0131p yay\u0131nlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Oysa a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da tek tek tarihi seyri ve belgeleriyle ispatlad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z gibi, Oktay Vural\u2019\u0131n bahsetti\u011fi 11. Nolu protokol\u00fcn haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131, imzalanmas\u0131nda Refah-Yol iktidar\u0131n\u0131n hi\u00e7bir ilgisi bulunmamaktayd\u0131. Kendi sorumluluklar\u0131ndan kurtulmak ve su\u00e7luluk psikolojisini bast\u0131rmak i\u00e7in ba\u015fkalar\u0131na sald\u0131rmak ve ger\u00e7ekleri sapt\u0131rmak\u2026 Ve hele hele, her bahane ile Erbakan\u2019a sata\u015fmak ve onu k\u00f6t\u00fclemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak, maalesef solcu, sa\u011fc\u0131 ve din istismarc\u0131s\u0131 kesimlerin ve Sabataist-Masonik merkezlerin marazl\u0131 tavr\u0131yd\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Her \u015feyden \u00f6nce:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 1-\u0130nanc\u0131m\u0131z a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, Kur\u2019an\u2019\u0131n kesin h\u00fck\u00fcmleriyle karara ba\u011flanan (Bak: Bakara Suresi ayet 178-179) Hz. Peygamber Efendimizin s\u00fcnneti (uygulamalar\u0131) ve t\u00fcm \u0130slam \u00e2limlerinin icma ve ittifak\u0131yla, l\u00fczumlu ve yararl\u0131 bulunan \u201c\u0130dam-k\u0131sas\u201d cezas\u0131n\u0131, gereksiz ve ge\u00e7ersiz saymak ve kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak k\u00fcf\u00fcr ve ink\u00e2rc\u0131l\u0131kt\u0131r. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 2-Siyasi ve sosyolojik olarak ta, bir devletin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k ve sayg\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak, canileri ve anar\u015fistleri hizaya sokacak idam gibi cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Bu nedenle, hem inanc\u0131na, hem de devletimizin birlik ve bekas\u0131na can\u0131 g\u00f6n\u00fclden ba\u011fl\u0131 olan Rahmetli Erbakan Hoca\u2019y\u0131, b\u00f6ylesi isnat ve iftiralarla t\u00f6hmet alt\u0131na almak, insafs\u0131zl\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Birilerinin kendi partilerini aklay\u0131p parlatmalar\u0131 ve propagandas\u0131n\u0131 yapmalar\u0131 hat\u0131r\u0131na, bir tak\u0131m mazeret ve mecburiyetlere s\u0131\u011f\u0131nmalar\u0131 ayr\u0131d\u0131r ve bunun de\u011ferlendirilmesini halk\u0131m\u0131z yapacakt\u0131r. Ama kendilerini temize \u00e7\u0131karmak i\u00e7in, Erbakan gibi Milli ve haysiyetli bir \u015fahsiyete \u00e7amur s\u0131\u00e7ratmak, Ha\u00e7l\u0131 emperyalizmin bir kurulu\u015fu olan AB\u2019ye kar\u015f\u0131 D-8 gibi tek ve ger\u00e7ek alternatif projeler geli\u015ftiren bir lidere b\u00f6ylesine isnatlar yak\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmak, en az\u0131ndan ay\u0131pt\u0131r. AKP\u2019nin talan ve tahribatlar\u0131na, Milli birlik ve dirli\u011fimizi y\u0131k\u0131c\u0131 at\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, vatanseverlerin ve vicdan ehlinin mutlaka el ve g\u00f6n\u00fcl birli\u011fi yapmas\u0131 gereken bir ortamda, bu gibi itham ve isnatlarla hi\u00e7bir yere var\u0131lamayacakt\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Kald\u0131 ki;<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 06 Nisan 2001’de, yine New York’ta “U.S. – Turkish Relations in The 21st Century” (21. Y\u00fczy\u0131lda Birle\u015fik Devletler- T\u00fcrk \u0130li\u015fkileri CFR) toplant\u0131s\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Bu toplant\u0131da TBMM’den Mehmet Ali \u0130rtem\u00e7elik<\/strong> (ANAP MV, Eski \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131ndan Sorumlu Devlet Bakan\u0131), Abdullah G\u00fcl <\/strong>(FP MV, TBMM D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Komisyonu ‘DK’ \u00fcyesi), Kamran \u0130nan<\/strong> (ANAP MV, TBMM DK Ba\u015fkan\u0131), Tahir K\u00f6se<\/strong> (DSP MV, SHP-DYP H\u00fck\u00fcmeti Eski Sanayi ve Ticaret Bakan\u0131), Oktay Vural <\/strong>(MHP MV, TBMM DK \u00fcyesi), Ayfer Y\u0131lma<\/strong>z (DYP MV, SHP-DYP Ekonomiden Sorumlu Devlet Bakan\u0131, Eski Hazine M\u00fcste\u015far Yrd.) konu\u015fmac\u0131 olarak birlikte bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r. Bu toplant\u0131ya Erbakan\u2019dan habersiz kat\u0131lan Abdullah G\u00fcl daha sonra Milli G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u2019ten ayr\u0131l\u0131p Recep T. Erdo\u011fan\u2019la AKP\u2019yi kuracakt\u0131r. Yani ABD\u2019nin derin devleti Siyonist Yahudi lobilerinin g\u00fcd\u00fcm\u00fcndeki CFR toplant\u0131s\u0131nda Oktay Vural ile bug\u00fcnk\u00fc AKP\u2019liler yan yana ve kol kolad\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n \u015eimdi s\u00f6z konusu s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve protokollerin tarihi seyrine bir g\u00f6z atal\u0131m.<\/span><\/p>\n A)Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi(A\u0130HS)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n S\u00f6zle\u015fme Avrupa Konseyi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tam ad\u0131, \u201c\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131n\u0131 ve Temel \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri Koruma S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u201ddir. S\u00f6zle\u015fme 04.11.1950 tarihinde Roma\u2019da kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giri\u015f tarihi 03.09.1953\u2019t\u00fcr.<\/span><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye S\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi, 04.11.1950 tarihinde imzalam\u0131\u015f ve 10.03.1954 tarih ve 6366 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile onaylam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kanunun ve S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin Resmi Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131m tarihi, 19.03.1954\u2019t\u00fcr. S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin onay belgesi 18.05.1954 tarihinde Avrupa Konseyi Genel Sekreterli\u011fine depo edilmi\u015ftir. Bu tarih S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin T\u00fcrkiye bak\u0131m\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi tarih olmaktad\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n S\u00f6zle\u015fmede d\u00fczenlenen ve kenar ba\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131 01.11.1998 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 11 Numaral\u0131 Protokol\u2019\u00fcn h\u00fck\u00fcmleri do\u011frultusunda S\u00f6zle\u015fme metnine i\u015flenen haklar ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/span><\/p>\n 1-Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 (madde-2), \u0130\u015fkence yasa\u011f\u0131 (madde-3), K\u00f6lelik ve zorla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma yasa\u011f\u0131 (madde-4), \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve g\u00fcvenlik hakk\u0131 (madde-5), Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 (madde-6), Kanunsuz ceza olmaz (madde-7), \u00d6zel ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 (madde-8), D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce, vicdan ve din \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (madde-9), \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (madde-10), Dernek kurma ve toplant\u0131 \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (madde-11), Evlenme hakk\u0131 (madde- 12), Etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 (madde-13), Ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131 (madde-14).<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n B)S\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ek Protokollerde d\u00fczenlenen haklar ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 1) Protokol No.1 20.03.1952 tarihinde Paris\u2019te kabul edilmi\u015f, 18.05.1954 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye Protokol\u2019\u00fc A\u0130HS ile birlikte 10.03.1954 tarih ve 6366 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun ile onaylam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Protokol\u2019de \u00fc\u00e7 hak d\u00fczenlenmektedir. Bu haklar \u015fu \u015fekildedir: 1.M\u00fclkiyetin korunmas\u0131 2.E\u011fitim hakk\u0131, 3.Serbest se\u00e7imlere hak, <\/span><\/strong>T\u00fcrkiye e\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 1\/2. maddeye, Tevhidi Tedrisat Kanununun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini ihlal etmeyece\u011fi do\u011frultusunda \u00e7ekince koymu\u015ftur.<\/span><\/p>\n 2)Protokol No.2; Bu Protokol, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesine, Bakanlar Komitesinin istemi \u00fczerine tavsiye g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc verme yetkisi tan\u0131yan bir protokold\u00fcr. Strasburg\u2019da 06.05.1963 tarihinde imzalanm\u0131\u015f ve 21.09.1970 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye 13.07.1967 tarih ve 900 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunla onaylam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. (RG.24.07.1967) Bakanlar Kurulunun bu onay\u0131 uygun bulmas\u0131na dair karar\u0131 da, Resmi Gazetenin 06.02.1968 tarihli say\u0131s\u0131nda yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00fcrkiye onay belgesini 25.03.1968 tarihinde Avrupa Konseyi Genel Sekreterli\u011fine depo etmi\u015f ve Protokol T\u00fcrkiye bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 21.09.1970 tarihi itibariyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. 11 No\u2019lu protokol\u00fcn kabul\u00fc ile birlikte 2 No\u2019lu protokol yoluyla S\u00f6zle\u015fmede yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikliklerin yerine 11 No\u2019lu protokol h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir.<\/span><\/p>\n 3)Protokol No.3; Bu Protokol S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 29, 30 ve 34. maddelerini de\u011fi\u015ftiren bir protokold\u00fcr. Strasburg\u2019da 06.5.963 tarihinde imzalanm\u0131\u015f, 21.09.1970 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. Ancak 11 No\u2019lu protokol h\u00fck\u00fcmleri 3 No\u2019lu Protokol h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin yerini alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00fcrkiye 3 No\u2019lu Protokol\u00fc 13.07.1967 tarih ve 901 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile onaylam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Onay Kanunu Resmi Gazetenin 24.07.1967 tarihli say\u0131s\u0131nda yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Onay belgesi 25.03.1968 tarihinde Avrupa Konseyi Genel Sekreterli\u011fi\u2019ne depo edilmi\u015ftir. Protokol T\u00fcrkiye bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 21.09.1970 tarihinden itibaren y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir.<\/span><\/p>\n 4)Protokol No.4, Strasburg\u2019da 16.09.1963 tarihinde imzaya a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131 ve 02.05.1968 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi. Kenar ba\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131 11 No\u2019lu Protokol ile d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye Protokol\u2019\u00fc 19.10.1992 tarihinde imzalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Protokol, 23.02.1994 tarih ve 3975 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile onaylanm\u0131\u015f ve Kanun Resmi Gazete\u2019nin 26.02.1994 tarihli say\u0131s\u0131nda yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Protokol\u2019\u00fcn T\u00fcrk\u00e7e \u00e7evirisi bakanlar Kurulu\u2019nun bu onaylamay\u0131 uygun buldu\u011funa dair 09.06.1994 tarih ve 94\/5749 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n eki olarak yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak T\u00fcrkiye onay belgesini Avrupa Konseyi Genel Sekreterli\u011fine depo etmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla prosed\u00fcr tamamlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak yasayla kabul edildi\u011fi i\u00e7in i\u00e7 hukuk bak\u0131m\u0131ndan protokol h\u00fck\u00fcmleri hukuksal sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furmaya elveri\u015flidir. Protokol\u2019de d\u00fczenlenen haklar ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/span><\/p>\n 1.Bor\u00e7tan \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc hapis yasa\u011f\u0131 2.Seyahat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 3.Vatanda\u015flar\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131 4.Yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n toplu olarak s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 5)Protokol No.5 Protokol Strasburg\u2019da 20.01.1966 tarihinde imzaya a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131 ve 20.12.1971 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi. S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 22. ve 40. maddelerini de\u011fi\u015ftiren bir Protokol\u2019d\u00fcr. Ancak bu Protokol ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fikliklerin yerini 11 No\u2019lu Protokol h\u00fck\u00fcmleri alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00fcrkiye Protokol\u2019\u00fc 14.05.1971 tarihinde imzalam\u0131\u015f ve Bakanlar Kurulunun 29.9.1971 tarihli, 7\/3211 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla onaylam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu karar 30.01.1971 tarihli Resmi Gazete\u2019de yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Onay belgesi, 20.12.1971 tarihinde Avrupa Konseyi genel sekreterli\u011fine depo edilmi\u015ftir.<\/span><\/p>\n 6)Protokol No.6; Protokol, Strasburg\u2019da 28.04.1983 tarihinde imzaya a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve 01.03.1985 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye 6 Numaral\u0131 Protokol\u00fc 15\/01\/2003 tarihinde imzalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00fcrkiye 26.06.2003 tarihli 4913 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u00f6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131ran kanunu \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015f ve Kanun Resmi Gazete\u2019nin 01.07.2003 tarihli say\u0131s\u0131nda yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n Protokol Bakanlar Kurulu\u2019nun 15\/08\/2003 tarih ve 2003\/6069 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile onaylanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Protokol onay belgesinin Avrupa Konseyi genel Sekreterli\u011fine depo edilmesiyle T\u00fcrkiye bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 01\/12\/2003 tarihinden itibaren y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck kazanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Protokol ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131yla ilgilidir.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 7)Protokol No.7; 7 No\u2019lu Protokol Strasburg\u2019da 22.11.1984 tarihinde imzalanm\u0131\u015f ve 01.11.1988 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. Kenar ba\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131 11 No\u2019lu Protokol\u2019e g\u00f6re d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye Protokol\u2019\u00fc 14.03.1985 tarihinde imzalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Protokol\u2019de d\u00fczenlenen hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/span><\/p>\n 1.Yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesine ili\u015fkin usuli g\u00fcvenceler 2.Ceza davalar\u0131nda temyiz hakk\u0131 3.Haks\u0131z mahk\u00fbmiyetten \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc tazminat 4.\u0130kinci kez yarg\u0131lanmama ya da cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmama hakk\u0131 5.E\u015fler aras\u0131nda e\u015fitlik<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 8)Protokol No.8; Protokol Viyana\u2019da 19.03.1985 tarihinde imzaya a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve 01.01.1990 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 20,21,23,28,29,30,31,34,40,41 ve 43. maddelerinde de\u011fi\u015fiklik yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak 11 No\u2019lu Protokol h\u00fck\u00fcmleri bu de\u011fi\u015fikliklerin yerine ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye 04.02.1986 tarihinde Protokol\u2019\u00fc imzalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Protokol\u2019\u00fc, 12.04.1989 tarih ve 3526 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile onaylam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (RG 20.04.1989). Onaylaman\u0131n uygun bulundu\u011funa dair Bakanlar Kurulu\u2019nun 23.06.1989 tarih ve 89\/14295 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 Resmi Gazete\u2019nin 29.08.1989 tarihli say\u0131s\u0131nda yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Onay belgesi Avrupa Konseyi Genel Sekreterli\u011fine 19.09.1989 tarihinde depo edilmi\u015f ve Protokol y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi 01.01.1990 tarihinden itibaren T\u00fcrkiye bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir.<\/span><\/p>\n 9)Protokol No.9; Protokol Roma\u2019da 06.11.1990 tarihinde imzalanm\u0131\u015f, 01.10.1994 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015f ve 11 No\u2019lu Protokol\u2019\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesiyle ortadan kalkm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 31,44,45 ve 48. maddelerinde de\u011fi\u015fiklik getirmekteydi. T\u00fcrkiye Protokol\u2019\u00fc 06.11.1990 tarihinde imzalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/span><\/p>\n 10)Protokol No.10; Protokol, Strasburg\u2019da 25.03.1992 tarihinde kabul edilmi\u015f ancak S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin taraf\u0131 olan t\u00fcm \u00fclkeler taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmemi\u015ftir. Protokol, 32. maddede de\u011fi\u015fiklik \u00f6ng\u00f6rmekteydi. Bu d\u00fczenleme 11 No\u2019lu Protokol ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/span><\/p>\n 11)Protokol No.11; BU Protokol, 11.05.1994 tarihinde Strasburg\u2019da imzalanm\u0131\u015f ve 01.11.1998 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye 11.05.1994 tarihinde imzalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Onay belgesi Avrupa Konseyi Genel Sekreterine 10.07.1997 tarihinde depo edilmi\u015ftir. (yani Refah-Yol iktidar\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan 40 g\u00fcn sonra Avrupa Konseyi Sekreterli\u011fine g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc Erbakan h\u00fck\u00fcmeti 28 Haziran 1996 da kurulmu\u015f 30 Haziran 1997 de sona ermi\u015ftir.) Protokol T\u00fcrkiye bak\u0131m\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck tarihi olan 01.11.1998 tarihinden itibaren y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fcktedir. Protokol, S\u00f6zle\u015fme maddelerinde (19 ila 56. maddeler) ve baz\u0131 protokollerde, denetim sistemlerinde de\u011fi\u015fiklikler yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yukar\u0131da yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z S\u00f6zle\u015fme ve Protokollerdeki hak listeleri \u201cmadde kenar ba\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131\u201d ad\u0131yla 11 No\u2019lu Protokolde yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 12)Protokol No.12, Roma\u2019da 04.11.2000 tarihinde imzaya a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00fcrkiye 18.04.2001 tarihinde imzalam\u0131\u015f ancak hen\u00fcz (29.04.2011 tarihi itibariyle) onaylamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Protokol ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenlemektedir.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cMadde 1-Genel ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131<\/span><\/strong>1.Yasayla d\u00fczenlenen herhangi bir haktan yararlanma, cinsiyet, \u0131rk, renk, dil, din, siyasal ya da ba\u015fka g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f, ulusal ya da toplumsal k\u00f6ken, bir ulusal az\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa mensup olma, m\u00fclkiyet, do\u011fum ya da di\u011fer stat\u00fcler gibi herhangi bir temelde ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n, g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nacakt\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 2.Hi\u00e7 kimse, herhangi bir kamu makam\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan paragraf 1\u2019de belirtilen herhangi bir temelde ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa tabi tutulmayacakt\u0131r.\u201d<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 13)Protokol No.13 Protokol Vilnius\u2019ta 03.05.2002 tarihinde imzaya a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00fcrkiye 09\/01\/2004 tarihinde imzalam\u0131\u015f, 16\/10\/2005 Tarih ve 5409 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u201c\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131n\u0131 ve Temel \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri Koruma S\u00f6zle\u015fmesine Ek, \u00d6l\u00fcm Cezas\u0131n\u0131n Her Ko\u015fulda Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair 13 No\u2019lu Protokol\u00fcn Onaylanmas\u0131n\u0131n Uygun Bulundu\u011fu Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u201du \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (RG 12\/10\/2005). Bakanlar Kurulunun 17\/11\/2005 Tarih ve 2005\/96849 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile bu protokol\u00fcn onaylanmas\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/span>T\u00fcrkiye bak\u0131m\u0131ndan 13 No\u2019lu Protokol 01\/06\/2006 tarihinden itibaren y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck kazanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cMadde 1.\u00d6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131:<\/span><\/strong>\u00d6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Hi\u00e7 kimse \u00f6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lmayacakt\u0131r ya da bu cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131 yap\u0131lmayacakt\u0131r\u201d<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 14)Protokol No.14 Protokol 13.05.2004 tarihinde imzaya a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve 01.06.2010 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye Protokol\u2019\u00fc 06.10.2004 tarihinde imzalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Protokol\u00fcn onaylanmas\u0131n\u0131n uygun bulundu\u011funa dair 5512 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun 01.06.2006 tarihinde kabul edilmi\u015f ve Resmi Gazetenin 8 A\u011fustos 2006 tarihli say\u0131s\u0131nda yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Protokol S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin denetim sisteminde de\u011fi\u015fiklikler \u00f6ng\u00f6rmektedir.<\/span><\/p>\n *Yukar\u0131daki metnin haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde Prof. Dr. Mehmet Semih Gemalmaz\u2019\u0131n Bo\u011fazi\u00e7i \u00dcniversitesi Yay\u0131nevi taraf\u0131ndan yay\u0131mlanan \u201c\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Belgeleri I\u201d adl\u0131 kitab\u0131ndan yararlan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/span><\/em>[1]<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n H\u00fcrriyet gazetesinin 19.12.1999\u2019da \u201cApo i\u00e7in \u015fok karar<\/span>\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 haberinde; <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n AVRUPA <\/span><\/strong>\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi’ne (A\u0130HM) ba\u015fvurarak, idam karar\u0131na tedbir koyduran ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesini istemeye haz\u0131rlanan Abdullah \u00d6calan’<\/strong>a, Anayasa Mahkemesi \u015foku geldi\u011fi yaz\u0131l\u0131yordu. <\/span><\/p>\n Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme’nin, T\u00fcrkiye Birle\u015fik Kom\u00fcnist Partisi’nin (TBKP), A\u0130HM karar\u0131na dayanarak, \u2018\u2018Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi ve kapatma karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131\u2019\u2019<\/strong> talebini oybirli\u011fi ile reddetti\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. 16 \u015eubat tarihli 1999\/2 say\u0131l\u0131 kararda, \u2018\u2018A\u0130HM karar\u0131 yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi i\u00e7in yeni kan\u0131t say\u0131lamaz\u2019\u2019 <\/strong>kayd\u0131 yer al\u0131yordu. <\/span><\/p>\n Anayasa Mahkemesi, uluslararas\u0131 mahkemenin TBKP ile ilgili karar\u0131n\u0131 Ceza Muhakemeleri Usul\u00fc Kanunu’na (CMUK) g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirmi\u015fti. Anayasa’n\u0131n 153. maddesine g\u00f6re yasama, y\u00fcr\u00fctme, yarg\u0131y\u0131 ba\u011flayan bu kararda, \u2018\u2018Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi’nin kararlar\u0131 CMUK’un 327. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesini gerektiren yeni bir olgu ya da kan\u0131t niteli\u011finde de\u011fildir\u2019\u2019<\/span> <\/i>deniliyordu. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Abdullah \u00d6CALAN’<\/span><\/strong>a verilen idam cezas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 ihtiyati tedbir karar\u0131 alan Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi’nin (A\u0130HM),<\/strong> \u015fimdiye kadar verdi\u011fi kararlar T\u00fcrkiye’ye pahal\u0131ya patl\u0131yordu. T\u00fcrkiye, A\u0130HM kararlar\u0131 nedeniyle 45 olayda toplam 2 milyon 200 bin dolar (yakla\u015f\u0131k 3.96 trilyon lira) tazminat \u00f6demek zorunda kal\u0131yordu. <\/span><\/p>\n A\u0130HM, temyiz mercii de\u011fil<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Ayr\u0131ca Adalet <\/span><\/strong>Bakan\u0131 Hikmet Sami T\u00fcrk<\/strong>, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi’nin (A\u0130HM)<\/strong> bir temyiz mercii olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurguluyordu. T\u00fcrk<\/strong> \u2018A\u0130HM <\/strong>\u00d6calan\u2019\u0131n yeniden yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131na karar verirse ne olur?’ <\/strong>sorusu \u00fczerine \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6yl\u00fcyordu: \u2018\u2018A\u0130HM’nin verebilece\u011fi karar hi\u00e7bir zaman bu davan\u0131n tekrar g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi bi\u00e7iminde olmaz. Mahkeme adil bir yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131rsa, tazminat \u00f6demesiyle ilgili olabilir. Esas itibar\u0131yla de adil yarg\u0131lama hakk\u0131ndan yararlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esine dayan\u0131larak b\u00f6yle bir sonuca var\u0131labilir.\u2019\u2019 <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Yine H\u00fcrriyet gazetesinin Emin \u00c7\u00f6la\u015fan 26.11.1999 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131nda;<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Nedir bu A\u0130HM? <\/strong>Do\u011frusunu isterseniz ben de iyi bilenlerden de\u011filim. Strasburg’da bu i\u015fin uzman\u0131 gazeteci arkada\u015f\u0131m Zeynel L\u00fcle’<\/strong>den ald\u0131\u011f\u0131m bilgileri size iletmek istiyorum. Zeynel <\/strong>\u015f\u00f6yle diyordu: <\/span><\/p>\n \u2018\u2018Apo’nun yakalanmas\u0131n\u0131n hemen ard\u0131ndan avukatlar\u0131 A\u0130HM’ye ba\u015fvurdular. Gerek\u00e7eleri i\u015fkence g\u00f6rece\u011fi, adil yarg\u0131lanmayaca\u011f\u0131 idi. Mahkeme ihtiyati tedbir karar\u0131 ald\u0131 ve T\u00fcrkiye’ye nas\u0131l yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, yarg\u0131 s\u00fcreci, hatta sa\u011fl\u0131k durumuyla ilgili sorular sormaya ba\u015flad\u0131. O kadar ayr\u0131nt\u0131ya girildi ki, kab\u0131z olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bile soruldu ve biz bunlara tek tek yan\u0131t vermek durumunda kald\u0131k. \u015eimdi idam karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131 sonras\u0131nda mahkeme yine devreye girecek ve <\/span><\/strong>\u2018Biz karar verinceye kadar idam etmeyin’ diyecek. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7 yakla\u015f\u0131k iki y\u0131l s\u00fcrecek. A\u0130HM bu a\u015famada her \u015feyi inceleyecek. \u00d6rne\u011fin, yarg\u0131 s\u00fcrecinin adil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirleyecek. <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Ama biz bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te onu asarsak, T\u00fcrkiye’ye <\/span><\/strong>\u2018Yanl\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131n\u0131z, bizim karar\u0131m\u0131zdan \u00f6nce asmaman\u0131z gerekirdi’ diyemez. Bunun tek yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 para cezas\u0131d\u0131r… \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc biz belli konulardaki anla\u015fmalara \u00e7ekince koymu\u015fuz ve imza atmam\u0131\u015f\u0131z.\u2019\u2019 <\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n \u015eimdi Ecevit’<\/strong>in bu konuda g\u00fcndeme A\u0130HM’<\/strong>yi ni\u00e7in getirdi\u011fi daha iyi anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131yordu. Buradan \u00e7\u0131kan sonu\u00e7 \u015fuydu: <\/span><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye, bu mahkemenin karar\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmadan \u00f6nce Apo’yu asmayacak ve zaman kazanacakt\u0131. Bu a\u015famada d\u0131\u015f ili\u015fkilerimiz a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan zaman kazanmak \u00f6nemli say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc Avrupa Birli\u011fi’ne aday \u00fcyeli\u011fimiz kap\u0131dayd\u0131. B\u00f6ylece Ecevit, hem i\u00e7 trib\u00fcnlere, hem de d\u0131\u015f trib\u00fcnlere oynamaktayd\u0131. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de idam cezas\u0131 ne zaman kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de idam cezas\u0131 en son 1984 y\u0131l\u0131nda uyguland\u0131. 9 A\u011fustos 2002 tarih ve 4771 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun ile (Avrupa Birli\u011fi 3. Uyum Paketi) idam cezas\u0131 bar\u0131\u015f zaman\u0131nda kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Hemen arkas\u0131ndan T\u00fcrkiye Kas\u0131m 2003\u2019te 6 nolu ek protokol\u00fc onaylad\u0131. Nihayet, 14 Temmuz 2004 tarih ve 5218 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunla T\u00fcrkiye idam cezas\u0131n\u0131 her ko\u015fulda mutlak olarak kald\u0131rd\u0131. Arkas\u0131ndan \u015eubat 2006\u2019da 13 say\u0131l\u0131 ek protokol\u00fc onaylad\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de idam cezas\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n Abdullah \u00d6calan davas\u0131 ile yak\u0131n ili\u015fkisi vard\u0131. \u00d6calan\u2019a verilen idam cezas\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan 29 Haziran 1999\u2019da onaylanmas\u0131yla kesinle\u015fti. Ancak Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k karar\u0131 TBMM\u2019ye g\u00f6ndermedi\u011finden, karar\u0131n uygulanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gereken kanun \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla uygulama ertelenmi\u015f oldu. Bu arada \u00d6calan\u2019\u0131n avukatlar\u0131 16 \u015eubat 1999\u2019da <\/span><\/strong>A\u0130HM<\/span><\/strong><\/a>\u2019ye ba\u015fvurdu.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Kas\u0131m 1999\u2019da A\u0130HM\u2019nin 1. Dairesi ihtiyati tedbir karar\u0131 verdi. Kararda, A\u0130HM\u2019nin davay\u0131 inceleyebilmesini sa\u011flayabilmek amac\u0131yla idam cezas\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmamas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyordu. T\u00fcrkiye karara uymay\u0131 kabul etti.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n A\u0130HM\u2019nin B\u00fcy\u00fck Dairesi 12 May\u0131s 2005\u2019te karar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda T\u00fcrkiye idam cezas\u0131n\u0131 kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015f, 6 nolu protokol\u00fc onaylam\u0131\u015f, 13 nolu protokol\u00fc ise imzalam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130dam dosyas\u0131 Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k\u2019ta 2 y\u0131l bekletildi<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 57\u2019inci H\u00fck\u00fcmette MHP milletvekili olan<\/span><\/strong> \u015fimdi ise B\u00fcy\u00fck Birlik Partisi Genel Ba\u015fkan Yard\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6revini s\u00fcrd\u00fcren Avukat Edip \u00d6zba\u015f <\/strong>da Ter\u00f6rist ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131n idam dosyas\u0131, 57\u2019inci H\u00fck\u00fcmetin koalisyon orta\u011f\u0131 olan \u00fc\u00e7 siyasi parti liderinin 10 Ocak 2000 tarihinde imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararla, A\u0130HM\u2019nin infaz ile ilgili ihtiyati tedbir karar\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek iki y\u0131l boyunca Ba\u015fbakanl\u0131k\u2019ta bekletildi\u011fi itiraf\u0131n\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. O d\u00f6nem, hen\u00fcz de\u011fi\u015fiklik yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan idam cezas\u0131 TCK\u2019da vard\u0131. Apo idamdan kurtar\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ama dosyas\u0131 da bir t\u00fcrl\u00fc Meclis\u2019e yollanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu nedenle bir Meclis soru\u015fturma \u00f6nergesi haz\u0131rlad\u0131m. Ba\u015fta Tansu \u00c7iller olmak \u00fczere di\u011fer muhalif partiler de bana destek vereceklerini beyan ettiler. \u015eahsen MHP\u2019den en az 70 arkada\u015f\u0131m\u0131n imzalayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyordum \u00f6nergeyi. Bu hem eski Ba\u015fbakan B\u00fclent Ecevit\u2019in Y\u00fcce Divan\u2019a sevkini hem de ter\u00f6rist ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131n idam\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak bir giri\u015fimdi. <\/span><\/p>\n Bu Meclis soru\u015fturma \u00f6nergesinden MHP Yetkililerinin haberi var m\u0131yd\u0131?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Edip \u00d6zba\u015f: \u00d6nergeyi gizli haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131 san\u0131yordum ancak imzaya a\u00e7madan \u00f6nce Devlet Bah\u00e7eli\u2019nin haberi olmu\u015ftu. \u00c7in seyahatine \u00e7\u0131kmadan \u00f6nce, bir milletvekilini benim evime g\u00f6ndererek, \u201c\u0130yi geli\u015fmeler olacak. \u00d6nergeyi sak\u0131n imzaya a\u00e7mas\u0131n\u201d diye uyar\u0131yordu. \u00d6nergemi imzaya a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m saatlerde, Devlet Bah\u00e7eli de \u00c7in Seddi\u2019nden bir beyanat vermeye ba\u015fl\u0131yordu. Benim haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131m \u00f6nergenin i\u00e7eri\u011fini okuyarak, \u201c\u00d6calan\u2019\u0131n idam dosyas\u0131 derhal Meclis\u2019e sevk edilecek\u201d diyordu. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klama koalisyon orta\u011f\u0131 olan Ecevit ya da Y\u0131lmaz\u2019\u0131 uyarmak de\u011fil, tam tersine benim haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131m \u00f6nergenin \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fc kesmeyi ama\u00e7l\u0131yordu. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc Bah\u00e7eli\u2019nin a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan \u00f6nergeye imza ataca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyen di\u011fer siyasi parti liderleri, \u201cBah\u00e7eli ile Edip \u00d6zba\u015f ayn\u0131 paralelde. Bu \u00f6nerge Bah\u00e7eli\u2019nin bir siyasi manevras\u0131 olabilir mi?\u201d diyerek \u00f6nergeme imza atmaktan \u00e7ekiniyordu. \u00c7iller benim MHP\u2019den istifa ederek DYP\u2019ye ge\u00e7mem durumumda imza atacaklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylerken, Abdullah G\u00fcl de \u201cy\u00fcr\u00fctme kurulunda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeden imza atamay\u0131z\u201d diyordu. B\u00f6ylece soru\u015fturma \u00f6nergesine imza toplanam\u0131yordu.<\/span><\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n 57\u2019inci h\u00fck\u00fcmet zaman\u0131nda AB\u2019ye ve di\u011fer k\u00fcresel ku\u015fatmalara mukavemet g\u00f6steremeyen MHP, tam aksine AB uyum yasalar\u0131, ikiz yasalar ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda pek \u00e7ok ad\u0131m at\u0131yor ve merdivenin ilk \u00fc\u00e7 basama\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f oluyordu. 9\u2019uncu uyum paketine kadar olan di\u011fer ad\u0131mlar\u0131 da daha sonraki h\u00fck\u00fcmetler at\u0131yordu. MHP, \u015fu anda kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve onursuz davran\u0131\u015f olarak nitelendirdi\u011fi, AB\u2019nin talimat\u0131yla TBMM g\u00fcndemine ta\u015f\u0131nan ve idam\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcndeki engelleri kald\u0131ran Uyum Yasalar\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131na imza at\u0131yordu. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Yani, TBMM\u2019de sadece \u015fov mu yap\u0131ld\u0131?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Edip \u00d6zba\u015f: <\/i><\/span><\/strong>03 Kas\u0131m 2002 se\u00e7imlerinin \u00f6ncesinde, Bah\u00e7eli \u015eevket B\u00fclent Yahnici\u2019ye Ankara Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na hitaben bir dilek\u00e7e yazd\u0131r\u0131yordu. Dilek\u00e7ede, Ecevit\u2019in kanunu ihlal etti\u011fi ve yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi talep ediliyordu. Ancak \u00f6nergeye kesinlikle imza atmayan bir hukuk\u00e7u, bir Ba\u015fbakan\u2019\u0131n Savc\u0131l\u0131k marifetiyle yarg\u0131lanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 elbette biliyordu. MHP ve Bah\u00e7eli, kendi yanl\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6rtebilmek i\u00e7in \u015fov yap\u0131yordu. <\/span><\/p>\n \u0130dam cezas\u0131 2002 A\u011fustos\u2019unda, imzalanan AB 3\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc uyum paketi ile kald\u0131r\u0131l\u0131yordu. O g\u00fcnlerde TBMM Genel Kurulunda neler ya\u015fan\u0131yordu?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Edip \u00d6zba\u015f: <\/i><\/span><\/strong>\u0130dam cezas\u0131 2002 A\u011fustos\u2019unda, imzalanan AB 3\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc uyum paketi ile kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. 8 A\u011fustos\u2019taki TBMM Genel Kurulu\u2019ndaki oylamada g\u00fcya idama kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kan ve \u015fov yapan MHP, asl\u0131nda idam\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in u\u011fra\u015ft\u0131. \u015e\u00f6yle ki Genel Kurul\u2019daki oylamadan hemen \u00f6nce Adalet Komisyonu\u2019nda bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yap\u0131ld\u0131. Komisyonda DYP Milletvekili Sevgi Esen bir \u00f6nerge vererek, \u201cidam kald\u0131r\u0131ls\u0131n ama bu h\u00fck\u00fcmde \u00d6calan istisna tutulsun\u201d<\/strong> teklifini yapt\u0131. MHP, bu \u00f6nergenin sunuldu\u011fu Adalet Komisyonu toplant\u0131s\u0131na kendi \u00fcyelerinin kat\u0131lmamas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar ald\u0131. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6nerge kabul edilmedi. Ama Genel Kurul\u2019da t\u00fcm MHP milletvekilleri ellerini kald\u0131rarak \u2019idam kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u2019 \u015fovu yapt\u0131. Ve \u00d6calan idamdan kurtuldu.[2]<\/span><\/span><\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n B\u00fct\u00fcn bu belge ve bilgileri, Erbakan Hocaya y\u00f6neltilen iddia ve iftiralar\u0131n, nas\u0131l haks\u0131z ve dayanaks\u0131z oldu\u011funa a\u00e7\u0131k ve kesin bir \u00f6rnek olsun diye yazd\u0131k. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc Siyonist d\u0131\u015f g\u00fc\u00e7leri ve i\u015fbirlik\u00e7i \u00e7evreleri \u00fcrk\u00fcten, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019yi yeni ve adil bir medeniyet merkezi yapacak ilmi ve milli projeler \u00fcreten yeg\u00e2ne lider, Rahmetli Erbakan\u2019d\u0131. Onun, olumlu ve onurlu giri\u015fim ve prensiplerine, kutlu ve mutlu hedeflerine bug\u00fcn de, gelecekte de ihtiya\u00e7 vard\u0131; \u0130slam ve insanl\u0131k ad\u0131na bunlara sahip \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lmas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131. K\u0131sacas\u0131 Erbakan Devrimi\u2019nin temelleri sa\u011flam at\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ama hen\u00fcz tamamlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve zafere ula\u015fmas\u0131 yak\u0131nd\u0131!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n H\u00fcsn\u00fc \u00d6nd\u00fcl \/ Avukat \/ 29 Nisan 2011 – Ankara <\/span><\/p>\n Yeni\u00e7a\u011f \/ 04 03 2007<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Eski koyu \u015feriat\u00e7\u0131 \u015fimdi PKK u\u015fa\u011f\u0131 BDP’li Altan Tan CNN T\u00fcrk Televizyonunda, MHP’yi kastederek, “Erbakan, eli kanl\u0131 katillerle se\u00e7im ittifak\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in o partiden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131” b\u00f6b\u00fcrlenerek anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Oysa \u015fimdi kendisi on binlerce bebek, \u00e7ocuk, kad\u0131n masum insan\u0131n katillerinin himayesine s\u0131\u011f\u0131nmaktan utanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Hem “Y\u0131llarca PKK’ya hizmet etmi\u015f ve zahmet \u00e7ekmi\u015f insanlar varken neden seni \u0130mral\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[151],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haziran-2013"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2614"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2614\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<\/p>\n
\n