{"id":31045,"date":"2025-09-30T22:50:59","date_gmt":"2025-09-30T19:50:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/?p=31045"},"modified":"2025-09-30T23:18:17","modified_gmt":"2025-09-30T20:18:17","slug":"chp-fiilen-iki-cepheye-ayrilmisti-ve-bu-surecte-iktidarin-parmagi-var-miydi-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/2025\/ekim-2025\/chp-fiilen-iki-cepheye-ayrilmisti-ve-bu-surecte-iktidarin-parmagi-var-miydi-2\/","title":{"rendered":"CHP F\u0130\u0130LEN \u0130K\u0130 CEPHEYE AYRILMI\u015eTI
VE
BU S\u00dcRE\u00c7TE \u0130KT\u0130DARIN PARMA\u011eI VAR MIYDI?"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

CHP F\u0130\u0130LEN \u0130K\u0130 CEPHEYE AYRILMI\u015eTI
\nVE
\nBU S\u00dcRE\u00c7TE \u0130KT\u0130DARIN PARMA\u011eI VAR MIYDI?\n<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Yarg\u0131; Hukuka ve Yasalara G\u00f6re mi, Yoksa Siyasi Havalara G\u00f6re mi \u00c7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rd\u0131!?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

CHP ile ilgili merakla beklenen mahkeme karar\u0131 kesin bir kanaat olu\u015fturmuyordu. Evet, K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu taraftarlar\u0131n\u0131n <\/strong>\u201cTedbir karar\u0131 verilmesi\u201d<\/em><\/strong> talebinin reddi, kar\u015f\u0131 tarafta temkinli bir sevince yol a\u00e7sa da durum h\u00e2l\u00e2 net g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fcyordu. <\/strong>\u201cBu CHP\u2019nin i\u00e7 meselesidir!\u201d<\/em><\/strong> diyen iktidar yanda\u015flar\u0131 da bo\u015f durmuyordu ve huzursuzdu. Davan\u0131n 24 Ekim 2025\u2019e ertelenmesi pek \u00e7ok soru i\u015faretini i\u00e7inde bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131yordu. Bu arada CHP b\u00fcnyesindeki saflar da iyice ayr\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f bulunuyordu. L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f\u2019\u0131n Avukat\u0131; \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel ve Ekrem \u0130mamo\u011flu cephesini, yani fiili CHP y\u00f6netimini \u201cSu\u00e7 \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\u201d olmakla itham ediyor ve kendince belgeler sunarak <\/strong>yolsuzluktan de\u011fil su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olmaktan<\/em> yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131 istiyordu. Ama \u00f6te yandan, \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel\u2019in mahkemeyi erteletmeyi ba\u015farmas\u0131 da elbette \u00f6nemli bir ba\u015far\u0131 say\u0131l\u0131yordu. Ancak 24 Ekim\u2019deki duru\u015fmada nas\u0131l bir karar \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hi\u00e7 kimse bilmiyor, hatta tahmin bile edemiyordu.<\/strong><\/p>

Hepsinden daha tehlikelisi; herkesin vicdan\u0131n\u0131 \u015fu ku\u015fku rahats\u0131z edip duruyordu: <\/strong>Yarg\u0131; hukuka ve yasalara g\u00f6re mi, yoksa siyasi havalara g\u00f6re mi h\u00fck\u00fcm veriyordu?!..<\/em><\/strong><\/p>

CHP\u2019de bu s\u00fcre\u00e7 nas\u0131l ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131?<\/strong><\/p>

Hat\u0131rlay\u0131n\u0131z; K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu Ekibinden eski Hatay B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f ve baz\u0131 delegeler taraf\u0131ndan <\/strong>CHP’nin 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131’na \u015faibe kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, delegelerin oylar\u0131n\u0131n r\u00fc\u015fvet kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 sat\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/em> gerek\u00e7esiyle farkl\u0131 mahkemelerde a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar; 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nde birle\u015ftiriliyordu… Davac\u0131lar, <\/strong>38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay’da r\u00fc\u015fvet ve oylamaya hile kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131yla delege iradesinin sakatland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131<\/em><\/strong> savunarak bu kurultay\u0131n iptal edilmesi, yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde (mutlak butlan) say\u0131larak \u00d6zel ve ekibinin g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve eski Genel Ba\u015fkan Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu y\u00f6netiminin g\u00f6revine iade edilmesi gerekti\u011fini savunuyordu. <\/strong><\/p>

Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, 26 May\u0131s 2025’teki duru\u015fmada, daval\u0131lar\u0131n “ihtiyati tedbir” olarak mevcut parti y\u00f6netiminin g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebini reddediyor ve davay\u0131 da “s\u00f6zl\u00fc savunma” i\u00e7in 30 Haziran’a erteliyordu.<\/strong><\/p>

30 Haziran 2025’teki 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay’\u0131n iptali istemli davan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclmesine k\u0131sa s\u00fcre kala Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ekrem \u0130mamo\u011flu ile 11 ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda; CHP delegelerine <\/strong>“oy kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda para, telefon ve ev verildi\u011fi”<\/em><\/strong> iddias\u0131yla ba\u015flatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131ndaki iddianameyi tamaml\u0131yor ve Ankara 26. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’ne g\u00f6nderiyordu. <\/strong><\/p>

Ancak, Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi “g\u00f6revsizlik” karar\u0131yla, dosyay\u0131 Ankara 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’ne yolluyordu. Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise mahkemenin “g\u00f6revsizlik” karar\u0131na itiraz ediyor; CHP’nin 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131’n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc <\/strong>Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi ise bu itiraz\u0131n sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131n\u0131n beklenmesine<\/em> h\u00fckmederek duru\u015fmay\u0131 \u00f6nce 8 Eyl\u00fcl’e erteliyordu. Bu tarihin, CHP’nin 4-9 Eyl\u00fcl tarihleri aras\u0131ndaki kurulu\u015f y\u0131l d\u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fc etkinliklerine denk gelmesi nedeniyle partinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz \u00fczerine duru\u015fma 15 Eyl\u00fcl’e b\u0131rak\u0131l\u0131yordu.<\/strong><\/p>

Peki bu ceza davas\u0131, kurultay\u0131n iptali davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 m\u0131yd\u0131?<\/strong><\/p>

\u0130ki davan\u0131n do\u011frudan birbirini ba\u011flamas\u0131 gerekli say\u0131lm\u0131yordu. Ancak Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’ne de, 30 Haziran’daki iptal davas\u0131 \u00f6ncesinde a\u00e7\u0131lan dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131 inceleme olana\u011f\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131yordu. <\/strong><\/p>

Siyasi kulislerde, hangi karar\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin farkl\u0131 tahminler yap\u0131l\u0131yordu. <\/strong>\u201cMahkemenin, kurultay iptali talebini reddetmesi halinde, \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel y\u00f6netimi g\u00f6revine devam edebilecek ve temyiz s\u00fcre\u00e7leri olsa da parti ola\u011fan ve ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultay takvimini i\u015fletmeye devam edecek\u201d<\/em> deniyordu.<\/strong><\/p>

“Mutlak butlan” karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 ise mevcut y\u00f6netimin g\u00f6revinin d\u00fc\u015fmesi ve 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay’da genel ba\u015fkanl\u0131k koltu\u011funu kaybeden eski Genel Ba\u015fkan Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu ve kurultay \u00f6ncesinde se\u00e7ilen Parti Meclisi’nin (PM) g\u00f6reve d\u00f6nmesinin yolunu a\u00e7\u0131yordu.<\/strong><\/p>

K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu, yeniden partinin ba\u015f\u0131na oturacak m\u0131yd\u0131?<\/strong><\/p>

Eski CHP Lideri Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu, kurultay davas\u0131yla ilgili sessizli\u011fini s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcyordu. Ancak K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu’na yak\u0131n baz\u0131 isimler, mutlak butlan \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131 halinde, <\/strong>“partiye kayyum atanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fc kesmek i\u00e7in” <\/em>partinin ba\u015f\u0131na ge\u00e7ece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcyordu. Gerek\u00e7e olarak da delege veya PM \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultay talebini, genel ba\u015fkan\u0131n uygulamaya koyacak olmas\u0131 g\u00f6steriliyordu. <\/strong><\/p>

K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu’na yak\u0131n baz\u0131 siyaset\u00e7iler de <\/strong>“Sonu\u00e7ta delege imzas\u0131 da olsa, PM karar\u0131 da olsa genel ba\u015fkan\u0131n i\u015fleme koyma yetkisi var. Kurultay\u0131 yapmazsa ne olacak? Diyelim ki salon tutmad\u0131, g\u00f6revli memur g\u00f6nderilmedi, yoklama yap\u0131lmad\u0131, kurultay\u0131 nas\u0131l yapacaklar?”<\/em><\/strong> g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc dile getiriyordu. CHP kulislerinde K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu’nun “hemen kurultay” karar\u0131 almayaca\u011f\u0131 ve ola\u011fan kurultay takvimini sonuna kadar kullanabilece\u011fi yorumlar\u0131 yap\u0131l\u0131yordu. B\u00f6yle bir durum, K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu’nun Kas\u0131m 2026’ya kadar partinin ba\u015f\u0131nda kalmas\u0131n\u0131n yolunu a\u00e7\u0131yordu.<\/strong><\/p>

Kurultay davas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesi ne anlama geliyor, CHP ne yapacakt\u0131?[1]<\/strong><\/p>

Ve sonunda Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi, CHP’nin 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131’n\u0131n iptali istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davay\u0131 24 Ekim 2025’e erteliyordu. Kamuoyunda “mutlak butlan” davas\u0131 olarak da adland\u0131ran davan\u0131n ertelenmesi, mevcut CHP a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan<\/strong> “en olumlu ikinci senaryonun” <\/em>ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi olarak yorumlan\u0131yordu. CHP, 21 Eyl\u00fcl’de yap\u0131lacak ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultay ile, “konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle, bir sonraki duru\u015fmada bu davan\u0131n reddedilmesini bekliyordu. Mahkemenin tedbir talebini reddetmesiyle, partiye kayyum atanmas\u0131 veya mutlak butlan karar\u0131yla, \u00f6nceki Genel Ba\u015fkan Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu’nun partinin ba\u015f\u0131na ge\u00e7mesi ihtimali \u015fimdilik \u00f6telenmi\u015f oluyordu.<\/strong><\/p>

Mevcut CHP kurmaylar\u0131 karara, <\/strong>“Siyasi bir davayd\u0131, reddedilmesi gerekirdi. Ancak erteleme gerek\u00e7elerine bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, mahkemenin karar\u0131 hukuken de\u011ferlendirilebilir” <\/em>yorumunu yap\u0131yordu. Davan\u0131n ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 saatlerde, Genel Ba\u015fkan \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel, partisinin Merkez Y\u00f6netim Kurulu’nu topluyor ve parti y\u00f6netimi duru\u015fmay\u0131 bu toplant\u0131da takip ediyordu.<\/strong><\/p>

Her ne kadar parti y\u00f6neticileri davan\u0131n “reddedilmesi” gerekti\u011fini savunsa da, mahkemenin erteleme karar\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eler, CHP y\u00f6netimini \u015fimdilik b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde rahatlatm\u0131\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyordu. <\/strong>Ancak bu karar, kayyum veya mutlak butlan\u0131n ihtimal d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da g\u00f6stermiyordu.<\/strong><\/p>

Mahkemenin erteleme karar\u0131 ne anlama geliyordu?<\/strong><\/p>

L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f ve baz\u0131 delegelerin, \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel’in genel ba\u015fkan se\u00e7ildi\u011fi 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay’\u0131n iptal edilerek, <\/strong>“mutlak butlan (yok h\u00fckm\u00fcnde) say\u0131lmas\u0131”<\/em><\/strong> ve Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu y\u00f6netiminin g\u00f6revine d\u00f6nmesi<\/em> istemiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada, davac\u0131lar ayn\u0131 zamanda, mevcut y\u00f6netimin “tedbiren” g\u00f6revden uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istiyordu. Tedbir karar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi, mevcut y\u00f6netimin hemen g\u00f6revden el \u00e7ektirilerek, yerine kayyum ya da eski y\u00f6netimin getirilmesinin yolunu a\u00e7\u0131yordu. Bu talebe kar\u015f\u0131n mahkeme <\/strong>“tedbir” karar\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na<\/em><\/strong> karar veriyor ve bu ihtimal \u015fimdilik bertaraf edilmi\u015f oluyordu.<\/strong><\/p>

Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultaya ve kongrelere vize mi veriliyordu?<\/strong><\/p>

Daha \u00f6nce <\/strong>CHP \u0130stanbul \u0130l y\u00f6netimine tedbiren kayyum atanmas\u0131<\/em><\/strong> karar\u0131n\u0131 veren \u0130stanbul 45. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin ara karar\u0131n\u0131 isteyen mahkeme, CHP avukatlar\u0131n\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine, \u0130stanbul \u0130l Kongresi’nin iptali istemini esastan reddeden Ankara 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esini de istiyordu. Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca, \u00c7ankaya’daki il\u00e7e se\u00e7im kurulundan 21 Eyl\u00fcl’deki CHP ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultay\u0131n\u0131n delege listesi birle\u015ftirme tutanaklar\u0131 ile \u0130stanbul karar\u0131yla ilgili Sar\u0131yer’deki il\u00e7e se\u00e7im kurulunun karar\u0131n\u0131 talep ediyordu.<\/strong><\/p>

Bunlar, mahkemenin \u0130stanbul hari\u00e7, 1000’e yak\u0131n delege imzas\u0131yla ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 <\/strong>21 Eyl\u00fcl’de yapaca\u011f\u0131 ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultay ve 24 Eyl\u00fcl’deki \u0130stanbul Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc \u0130l Kongresi’ne “vize vermesi” olarak<\/em><\/strong> yorumlan\u0131yordu. Mevcut CHP kurmaylar\u0131, ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultay ve \u0130stanbul \u0130l Kongresi’nin usule uygun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece tespit edilmesi halinde, davan\u0131n 24 Ekim’deki duru\u015fmada “konusuz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmesi gerekti\u011fini savunuyordu.<\/strong><\/p>

CHP’nin 38. Ola\u011fan Kurultay\u0131’na hile kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle \u0130stanbul B\u00fcy\u00fck\u015fehir Belediye Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ekrem \u0130mamo\u011flu ve 11 ki\u015fi hakk\u0131ndaki ceza davas\u0131n\u0131n<\/em><\/strong> ise Ankara 26. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’nde, 4 Kas\u0131m’da g\u00f6r\u00fclece\u011fi biliniyordu\u2026 Bu nedenle Ankara 42. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin, ceza davas\u0131n\u0131 “bekletici neden” saymak i\u00e7in duru\u015fmay\u0131 4 Kas\u0131m sonras\u0131na ertelemesi de ihtimal dahilinde de\u011ferlendiriliyordu. Ancak duru\u015fmay\u0131 24 Ekim’e ertelemesi, ceza davas\u0131n\u0131 “bekletici neden saymayaca\u011f\u0131”n\u0131n g\u00f6stergesi olarak yorumlan\u0131yordu.<\/strong><\/p>

Mevcut parti y\u00f6netiminde a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f, Genel Ba\u015fkan \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel’in de daha \u00f6nce a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, <\/strong>\u201cdavan\u0131n sonu\u00e7 de\u011fil, s\u00fcre\u00e7 odakl\u0131”<\/em><\/strong> oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde oluyordu. \u0130ktidara yak\u0131n \u00e7evrelerin, <\/strong>“\u015fik\u00e2yet eden de, edilen de CHP’li”<\/em><\/strong> s\u00f6ylemiyle bu alg\u0131y\u0131 yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmesi yap\u0131lan toplant\u0131da, davay\u0131 a\u00e7an L\u00fctf\u00fc Sava\u015f dahil, bir\u00e7ok ismin art\u0131k parti \u00fcyesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade ediliyordu. MYK’da baz\u0131 \u00fcyeler, \u0130stanbul \u0130l y\u00f6netimine kayyum atanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen n\u00f6bete, baz\u0131 milletvekillerinin gelmemesini ele\u015ftiriyordu. Ancak, baz\u0131 parti kurmaylar\u0131, bu a\u015famadan sonra “i\u00e7 bar\u0131\u015f\u0131n” sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemli oldu\u011funu belirterek, bu isimlerin d\u0131\u015flanmas\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fck yakla\u015f\u0131mlardan ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istiyordu. <\/strong><\/p>

Ola\u011fan Kurultay ne zaman yap\u0131lacakt\u0131?<\/strong><\/p>

CHP 21 Eyl\u00fcl’de ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc kurultay\u0131n\u0131 yapmaya haz\u0131rlan\u0131yordu. Kurultay davas\u0131n\u0131 bo\u015fa d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmek i\u00e7in bu karar\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekilerek, bu kurultayda parti y\u00f6netiminde \u00f6nemli bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik beklenmiyordu. Genel Ba\u015fkan \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel ve y\u00f6netiminin 6 Nisan’daki Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Kurultay’da “g\u00fcvenoyu” ald\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekilerek, “21 Eyl\u00fcl’deki kurultayda ise delegenin g\u00fcven tazeleyece\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcyordu. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7ten parti g\u00fc\u00e7lenerek \u00e7\u0131kacak” yorumu yap\u0131l\u0131yordu.<\/strong><\/p>

CHP, “mutlak butlan” davas\u0131n\u0131 da dikkate alarak 39. Ola\u011fan Kurultay takvimini h\u0131zland\u0131r\u0131yordu. Ge\u00e7en temmuz ay\u0131nda kurultay takvimini ba\u015flatan CHP, Ekim sonuna kadar il kongrelerini tamamlay\u0131p ola\u011fan kurultay\u0131 yapmay\u0131 planl\u0131yordu. MYK’da da ola\u011fan kurultay takvimi masaya yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131 ve b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde tamamlanan il\u00e7e kongrelerinin ard\u0131ndan, il kongrelerinin de h\u0131zland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131yordu.\u201d <\/strong><\/p>

Ancak b\u00fct\u00fcn bunlar \u00d6zg\u00fcr \u00d6zel ve Ekibinin hesaplar\u0131yd\u0131. 24 Ekim\u2019de herkesi \u015foke eden bir karar \u00e7\u0131karsa \u015fa\u015f\u0131rmamal\u0131yd\u0131. Biraz daha bekleyelim, g\u00f6relim yar\u0131nlar neler do\u011furacakt\u0131?<\/strong><\/p>

Bu arada, CHP\u2019nin Sar\u0131yer\u2019deki binas\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalara ba\u015flayan G\u00fcrsel Tekin\u2019in \u015fu itiraflar\u0131 \u00fczerinde durmak laz\u0131md\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>

\u201cFET\u00d6\u2019n\u00fcn uyuyan h\u00fccreleri, partimize s\u0131zmay\u0131 ba\u015farm\u0131\u015f durumdad\u0131r. Bunlar CHP\u2019yi \u00f6nce iktidara kar\u015f\u0131 k\u0131\u015fk\u0131rt\u0131p kullanmay\u0131, ard\u0131ndan da hepten yok edip ortadan kald\u0131rmay\u0131 planlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u2026 Bu yakla\u015f\u0131m karanl\u0131k \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn en bilinen y\u00f6ntemi olmaktad\u0131r!\u201d<\/em><\/strong>[2]<\/strong><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

<\/a><\/p>

  1. BBC T\u00fcrk\u00e7e \u2013 A. Say\u0131n<\/li>
  2. Sabah Gazetesi \u2013 17.09.2025<\/li><\/ol>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    CHP F\u0130\u0130LEN \u0130K\u0130 CEPHEYE AYRILMI\u015eTI VE BU S\u00dcRE\u00c7TE \u0130KT\u0130DARIN PARMA\u011eI VAR MIYDI? Yarg\u0131; Hukuka ve Yasalara G\u00f6re mi, Yoksa Siyasi Havalara G\u00f6re mi \u00c7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rd\u0131!? CHP ile ilgili merakla beklenen mahkeme karar\u0131 kesin bir kanaat olu\u015fturmuyordu. Evet, K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu taraftarlar\u0131n\u0131n \u201cTedbir karar\u0131 verilmesi\u201d talebinin reddi, kar\u015f\u0131 tarafta temkinli bir sevince yol a\u00e7sa da durum h\u00e2l\u00e2 net g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fcyordu. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7292],"tags":[6263,6524,6789,7281,7282,7283,7284],"class_list":["post-31045","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ekim-2025","tag-chp","tag-kemal-kilicdaroglu","tag-ozgur-ozel","tag-mutlak-butlan","tag-yargi","tag-chp-kurultayi","tag-ekram-imamoglu"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31045","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31045"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31045\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}