\u00a0<\/p>\n
DARW\u0130N\u0130ZM YUTTURMACASI VE<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n D\u0130NDAR ERDO\u011eAN’IN DUYARSIZLI\u011eI!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 10 Nisan 2001 tarihinde Rahmetli Erbakan Hocam\u0131z\u0131n dolayl\u0131 te\u015fvikleriyle ANAP Diyarbak\u0131r Milletvekili Sebgetullah Seydao\u011flu, Milli E\u011fitim Bakan\u0131’n\u0131n yan\u0131tlamas\u0131 i\u00e7in Meclis Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na bir soru \u00f6nergesi sunmu\u015flard\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n “21. y\u00fczy\u0131lda, Lise ve Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131nda 19. y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n k\u00f6hne iddialar\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren Darwinizm felsefesinin \u00f6\u011fretilmesi bilime ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir gericilik de\u011fil midir?”<\/span><\/em><\/strong> <\/span>diye sormu\u015flard\u0131. D\u00f6nemin DYP Milletvekili \u0130hsan Aytekin de Ba\u015fbakan Ecevit’e benzer bir soru \u00f6nergesi sunmu\u015flard\u0131. FP’li Zeki \u00c7elik de bunlara destek \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ancak maalesef bu giri\u015fimlerden beklenen sonu\u00e7 al\u0131namam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Koalisyon ortaklar\u0131 ANAP, MHP ve DSP bu sorulara ve konulara ilgisiz kalm\u0131\u015flard\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Erbakan Hocam\u0131z\u0131n, bu y\u00f6ndeki giri\u015fimleri ANAP’taki ve Do\u011fru Yol’daki baz\u0131 inan\u00e7l\u0131 Milletvekilleri \u00fczerinden ve dolayl\u0131 te\u015fviklerle yapt\u0131rmas\u0131; toplumda masonik merkezlerin ve d\u0131\u015f g\u00fc\u00e7lerin olu\u015fturduklar\u0131 \u00f6n yarg\u0131lar ve saplant\u0131lar y\u00fcz\u00fcnden, Milli G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f’\u00fcn her teklifine tepkiyle yakla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemek ama\u00e7l\u0131yd\u0131. Ayr\u0131ca, dindar ve Milliyet\u00e7i san\u0131larak oy verilen partilerin ger\u00e7ek ayar\u0131n\u0131 halk\u0131m\u0131za g\u00f6stermek hesapl\u0131yd\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Ard\u0131ndan dindar kahraman Sn. Erdo\u011fan’\u0131n AKP iktidar\u0131 tam 16 y\u0131l boyunca bu konuda duyars\u0131z kalm\u0131\u015f, Lise ve Y\u00fcksek okullarda <\/span><\/strong>“bilimsel ger\u00e7ek!” <\/span><\/em><\/strong>diye Darwinist \u00f6\u011fretiler okutulmu\u015f ve tabi Lise ve \u00dcniversite imtihanlar\u0131nda bu as\u0131ls\u0131z iddialar soru olarak da \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ba\u015fta Milli \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm Dergisi’nin itirazlar\u0131 ve yo\u011fun bask\u0131lar \u00fczerine, AKP iktidar\u0131 ay\u0131p savmak cinsinden 2017-2018 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in <\/span><\/strong>“Hayat\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 ve Evrim”<\/span><\/em><\/strong> \u00fcnitesini Lise 4. S\u0131n\u0131f m\u00fcfredat\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015f, ancak bu as\u0131ls\u0131z ve ink\u00e2rc\u0131 felsefenin temelsizli\u011fini ve ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fini, bilimsel veriler ve y\u00f6ntemlerle tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve bu \u015fekilde okutulmas\u0131 konusuna, Ha\u00e7l\u0131 Bat\u0131’n\u0131n ve masonik odaklar\u0131n korkusundan el atmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Oysa bizim amac\u0131m\u0131z, Evrim teorisinin ve Darwinist felsefenin yasaklanmas\u0131 de\u011fil; bu y\u00f6ndeki iddialar\u0131n da, kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131ndaki bilimsel do\u011frular\u0131n da, televizyon programlar\u0131nda, Lise ve \u00dcniversite s\u0131n\u0131flar\u0131nda ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z ve tarafs\u0131z bir ortamda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n okullarda ders kitab\u0131 olarak okutulmas\u0131d\u0131r. Yani tek tarafl\u0131 Darwinist safsatalar\u0131n ve Evrim yalanlar\u0131n\u0131n bilimsel ve tek ger\u00e7ekmi\u015f gibi \u00e7ocuklar\u0131m\u0131za dayat\u0131lmamas\u0131d\u0131r. Milli \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Ekibi olarak; Orta, Lise ve \u00dcniversite seviyesinde, \u00f6\u011frencilerimizin kapasitelerine uygun bi\u00e7imde kademe kademe dokuz farkl\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131f i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 “\u0130man Ger\u00e7e\u011fi ve Evrim Teorisi”<\/em> \u00fczerine ders kitaplar\u0131 haz\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z vard\u0131r. \u00dclkeyi y\u00f6netmeye talip 100 y\u0131ll\u0131k, 50 y\u0131ll\u0131k partilerin, g\u00fcya Sa\u011fc\u0131, Milliyet\u00e7i ve s\u00f6zde \u0130slamc\u0131 nice h\u00fck\u00fcmetlerin ba\u015faramad\u0131klar\u0131, hatta ba\u015flayamad\u0131klar\u0131; gen\u00e7li\u011fimiz ve gelece\u011fimizle ilgili hayati \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131yan bu husustaki haz\u0131rl\u0131klar\u0131 da, Allah’\u0131n izniyle ve Erbakan Hocam\u0131z\u0131n \u00f6\u011fretileri sayesinde yine Milli \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm Ekibi yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Evrim Safsatas\u0131!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Evrim teorisi ya da “Darwinizm” kavramlar\u0131n\u0131 duyan insanlar\u0131n bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc, bu kavramlar\u0131n sadece biyolojinin ilgi alan\u0131na girdi\u011fini ve kendi ya\u015famlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bir \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sanmaktad\u0131r. Oysa, evrim teorisi, biyolojik bir kavram olman\u0131n \u00f6tesinde, d\u00fcnya \u00fczerinde yayg\u0131n bir kitleyi etkisi alt\u0131na alm\u0131\u015f yanl\u0131\u015f bir felsefenin altyap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Bu felsefe, sadece maddenin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul eden, insan\u0131 bir “madde y\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131” olarak g\u00f6ren, insan\u0131n geli\u015fmi\u015f bir hayvan t\u00fcr\u00fc olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve do\u011fadaki tek ge\u00e7erli kanunun “\u00e7at\u0131\u015fma” oldu\u011funu varsayan bir safsatad\u0131r. \u0130smi “materyalizm”dir ve her ne kadar bilim g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fc alt\u0131nda insanlara empoze edilse de, bilimsel bir dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunmayan eski bir dogmad\u0131r. Eski Yunan’da do\u011fan bu dogma, 18. y\u00fczy\u0131lda baz\u0131 Avrupal\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrler taraf\u0131ndan yeniden tarihin tozlu raflar\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 19. y\u00fczy\u0131lda da Marx, Darwin, Freud gibi teorisyenler taraf\u0131ndan bilimlere uygulanm\u0131\u015f, daha do\u011frusu \u00e7e\u015fitli bilim dallar\u0131 materyalist felsefeye uydurulabilmek i\u00e7in \u00e7arp\u0131t\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n \u0130nsanlar materyalist felsefenin: “Sen, tesad\u00fcfen ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f, kimseye kar\u015f\u0131 sorumlulu\u011fu olmayan geli\u015fmi\u015f bir hayvans\u0131n” \u015feklindeki aldat\u0131c\u0131 telkinine inand\u0131k\u00e7a, inan\u00e7 ve de\u011ferlerini yitirmeye ba\u015flam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bunun sonucunda pek \u00e7ok toplumda sevgi, merhamet, fedak\u00e2rl\u0131k, d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck, adalet gibi ahl\u00e2ki erdemler ve maalesef inan\u00e7 temelleri dejenere olmaktad\u0131r. Materyalizmin, “Do\u011fan\u0131n kural\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmad\u0131r”<\/em> \u015feklindeki yalan\u0131na kanan insanlar, t\u00fcm hayatlar\u0131n\u0131 di\u011fer insanlara kar\u015f\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir “\u00e7\u0131kar \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131” olarak alg\u0131lam\u0131\u015f ve g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015fte modern, ancak \u00f6zde “orman kanunlar\u0131na” g\u00f6re d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bir ya\u015fam kurmu\u015flard\u0131r. K\u0131sacas\u0131, son iki y\u00fczy\u0131ld\u0131r insanl\u0131\u011fa isabet eden belalarda, materyalist felsefenin b\u00fcy\u00fck bir rol\u00fc vard\u0131r. \u0130nsanlar aras\u0131ndaki farkl\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n bir “\u00e7at\u0131\u015fma” nedeni oldu\u011funu varsayan her t\u00fcrl\u00fc d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncede, bu felsefenin etkisi bulunmaktad\u0131r. S\u00f6zde din ad\u0131na ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan, ama masum insanlar\u0131n can\u0131na kastederek dine g\u00f6re en b\u00fcy\u00fck g\u00fcnahlardan birini i\u015fleyen I\u015e\u0130D’vari ter\u00f6ristlerin k\u00f6keninde bile bu Darwinist d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce yatmaktad\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f Hakikati ve Harikalar\u0131!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Oysa yery\u00fcz\u00fcnde ya\u015fayan milyonlarca canl\u0131 t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn her birinin birbirinden mucizevi farkl\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131, birbirine hi\u00e7 benzemeyen davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131, birbirinden kusursuz fiziksel yap\u0131lar\u0131 vard\u0131r. Bu canl\u0131lar\u0131n her biri benzersiz incelikler ve g\u00fczelliklerle yarat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bitkiler, hayvanlar ve en ba\u015fta da insan, d\u0131\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcmlerinden g\u00f6zle g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen h\u00fccrelerine kadar b\u00fcy\u00fck bir bilgi ve sanatla varl\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bug\u00fcn canl\u0131lar\u0131n her detay\u0131n\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131ran, bu detaylardaki mucizevi y\u00f6nlerini ortaya \u00e7\u0131karan, t\u00fcm bunlar\u0131n nas\u0131l meydana geldi\u011fi sorusuna cevap arayan \u00e7ok say\u0131da bilim dal\u0131 ve bu bilim dallar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapan on binlerce bilim adam\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu bilim adamlar\u0131n\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131, inceledikleri yap\u0131lardaki mucizevi y\u00f6nleri ve bunlar\u0131n meydana getirilmesindeki akl\u0131 ke\u015ffettik\u00e7e, bunlara hayranl\u0131k duymakta ve t\u00fcm bunlar\u0131n sonsuz bir ak\u0131l ve bilgi ile yarat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na tan\u0131k olmaktad\u0131rlar. Ancak bir k\u0131sm\u0131 da, \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 bir \u015fekilde, t\u00fcm bu mucizevi \u00f6zellikleri var edenin \u015fuursuz tesad\u00fcfler oldu\u011funu iddia etmek sapk\u0131nl\u0131\u011f\u0131na yakalanmaktad\u0131rlar. S\u00f6z konusu beyinsiz bilim adamlar\u0131, evrim teorisine inananlard\u0131r. Bu ki\u015filere g\u00f6re canl\u0131lar\u0131 meydana getiren proteinler, h\u00fccreler ve organlar, sadece tesad\u00fcflerin art arda s\u0131ralanmas\u0131yla var olmu\u015flard\u0131r. Y\u0131llarca e\u011fitim alm\u0131\u015f, uzun ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar yapm\u0131\u015f, g\u00f6zle g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen tek bir h\u00fccredeki tek bir organelin mucizevi i\u015flevleri \u00fczerine kitaplar yazm\u0131\u015f insanlar, hayret verici bir \u015fekilde, bu ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc yap\u0131lar\u0131 k\u00f6r tesad\u00fcflerin meydana getirdi\u011fini savunmaktad\u0131rlar. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Anl\u0131 \u015fanl\u0131 profes\u00f6rlerin inand\u0131klar\u0131 tesad\u00fcfler zinciri o kadar ak\u0131l almazd\u0131r ki, i\u00e7inde bulunduklar\u0131 durum, d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan bakanlar\u0131 hayretler i\u00e7inde b\u0131rakmaktad\u0131r. Bu profes\u00f6rlere g\u00f6re, \u00f6nce bir\u00e7ok tesad\u00fcf meydana gelerek basit kimyasal maddelerin i\u00e7inden -ger\u00e7ekte tesad\u00fcfen olu\u015fmas\u0131 “rastgele sa\u00e7\u0131lan harflerin kusursuz bir \u015fiir olu\u015fturmalar\u0131” kadar imk\u00e2ns\u0131z olan- bir protein olu\u015fturmu\u015flard\u0131r. Bu iddia sahipleri, sonra ba\u015fka tesad\u00fcflerin ba\u015fka proteinleri meydana getirerek, yine tesad\u00fcfen bu proteinleri bir araya toplad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve onlar\u0131 uygun \u015fekilde organize etmeyi ba\u015farm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Sadece proteinler de\u011fil, DNA, RNA, enzimler, hormonlar, h\u00fccre organelleri gibi her biri son derece kompleks olan h\u00fccre i\u00e7i yap\u0131lar hep tesad\u00fcfen ve yan yana olu\u015fmu\u015flard\u0131r. Bu milyonlarca tesad\u00fcf sonucunda ise ilk h\u00fccre meydana gelmi\u015ftir. K\u00f6r tesad\u00fcflerin marifeti olan mucizeler burada son bulmam\u0131\u015f, bu h\u00fccre tesad\u00fcflerin yard\u0131m\u0131 ile \u00e7o\u011falmaya ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu iddiaya g\u00f6re bir ba\u015fka tesad\u00fcf, h\u00fccreleri organize etmeyi ba\u015farm\u0131\u015f ve bundan da ilk canl\u0131lar ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Oysa, bir canl\u0131daki tek bir g\u00f6z\u00fcn olu\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dahi, meydana gelmesi imk\u00e2ns\u0131z milyonlarca olay\u0131n bir arada ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi laz\u0131md\u0131r. \u0130\u015fte burada da tesad\u00fcf denen k\u00f6r s\u00fcre\u00e7 devreye s\u0131zm\u0131\u015f; \u00f6nce, yine s\u00f6zde tesad\u00fcfen olu\u015fan kafatas\u0131nda en uygun yerlere en uygun b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fckte iki delik a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f ve sonra buraya tesad\u00fcfen gelen h\u00fccreler, yine tesad\u00fcfen g\u00f6z\u00fc in\u015fa etmeye ba\u015flam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi bu, asl\u0131nda tesad\u00fcfler, sonu\u00e7ta ne elde etmek istediklerini bilerek i\u015fe koyulmu\u015flard\u0131r. Daha en ba\u015ftan, “g\u00f6rmek, i\u015fitmek, nefes almak” ne demektir bilen, yery\u00fcz\u00fcnde hi\u00e7bir \u00f6rne\u011fi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde bunlardan haberdar olan “tesad\u00fcf”, b\u00fcy\u00fck bir bilin\u00e7 ve ak\u0131l g\u00f6stererek, son derece ileri g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fl\u00fc davranarak, canl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ad\u0131m ad\u0131m in\u015fa etmi\u015f durumdad\u0131r. \u0130\u015fte, insanlar\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck sayg\u0131 duyarak isimlerini and\u0131\u011f\u0131, fikirlerini benimsedi\u011fi bu profes\u00f6rler, bilim adamlar\u0131, ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131lar, bu denli ak\u0131l d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir senaryoya k\u00f6r\u00fc k\u00f6r\u00fcne ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Halen de \u00e7ocuksu bir inatla, bu masallar\u0131na inanmayanlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015flamakta, onlar\u0131 bilimsel olmamakla ve ba\u011fnazl\u0131kla su\u00e7lamaktad\u0131rlar. Ku\u015fkusuz bunun, Orta \u00c7a\u011f’da d\u00fcnyan\u0131n d\u00fcz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia edenleri yarg\u0131layarak cezaland\u0131ran, tutucu, yobaz ve cahil anlay\u0131\u015ftan hi\u00e7bir fark\u0131 yoktur. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n \u00dcstelik bu safsatalara inanan insanlar i\u00e7inde Allah’a iman etti\u011fini, M\u00fcsl\u00fcman oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyenler de \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Bu insanlar “t\u00fcm canl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 Allah yaratt\u0131” demeyi bilimsel bulmayan, bunun yerine “milyonlarca mucizenin tesad\u00fcf denen \u015fuursuz bir s\u00fcre\u00e7le olu\u015ftu\u011funu” s\u00f6ylemenin bilimsellik oldu\u011funa inanan zavall\u0131lard\u0131r. Bu insanlar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131na ta\u015ftan, tahtadan yontulmu\u015f bir put konsa ve “Bak\u0131n bu oday\u0131 ve i\u00e7indekileri bu put meydana getirdi”<\/em> dense, bunun son derece sa\u00e7ma oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyecek ve buna asla inanmayacaklard\u0131r. Ama buna ra\u011fmen “Bak\u0131n bu d\u00fcnyay\u0131 ve i\u00e7indeki birbirinden harika milyonlarca canl\u0131y\u0131 tesad\u00fcf denen \u015fuursuz s\u00fcre\u00e7 b\u00fcy\u00fck bir planlama yaparak, zaman i\u00e7inde olu\u015fturdu”<\/em> \u015feklinde ifade edilen bir hurafeyi, en b\u00fcy\u00fck bilimsel a\u00e7\u0131klama olarak halka duyurmaktad\u0131rlar. K\u0131sacas\u0131 bu insanlar, tesad\u00fcfleri ilah yerine koymakta, tesad\u00fcflerin t\u00fcm evrendeki hassas sistemleri ve canl\u0131lar\u0131 yaratabilecek kadar ak\u0131ll\u0131, bilin\u00e7li ve g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc oldu\u011funu varsaymaktad\u0131rlar. Onlara, t\u00fcm canl\u0131lar\u0131 yaratan\u0131n, sonsuz ak\u0131l sahibi Allah oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu ger\u00e7e\u011fin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyen evrimci profes\u00f6rler, \u015fuursuz, ak\u0131ls\u0131z, g\u00fc\u00e7s\u00fcz ve iradesiz milyarlarca tesad\u00fcf\u00fcn yarat\u0131c\u0131 g\u00fcc\u00fc oldu\u011funu savunmaktad\u0131rlar. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n E\u011fitimli, zeki ve bilgili insanlar\u0131n, toplu olarak, tarihin en sa\u00e7ma, en ak\u0131l ve mant\u0131k d\u0131\u015f\u0131 iddias\u0131na b\u00f6yle b\u00fcy\u00fclenmi\u015fcesine inan\u0131yor olmalar\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fa\u015fk\u0131nl\u0131k ve sapk\u0131nl\u0131kt\u0131r. Allah, bir mucize olarak nas\u0131l h\u00fccre gibi ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc bir organizasyona ve \u00f6zelliklere sahip bir varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarat\u0131yorsa, bu insanlar da yine ak\u0131l almaz \u015fekilde, \u00e7ok a\u00e7\u0131k ger\u00e7ekleri g\u00f6remeyecek kadar k\u00f6r ve kavrama yetene\u011finden yoksun davranmaktad\u0131rlar. Oysa Darwinizm, bilimsel deliller kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda tamamen \u00e7\u00f6km\u00fc\u015f bir teori olmas\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, ak\u0131l ve mant\u0131kla da hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde ba\u011fda\u015fmayan, kendisini savunanlar\u0131 son derece k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcren b\u00fcy\u00fck bir aldan\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Akl\u0131n ve Vicdan\u0131n Kullan\u0131lmas\u0131!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n \u00c7o\u011fu insan bir bilim adam\u0131ndan duydu\u011fu her \u015feyi, mutlak do\u011fru sanmaktad\u0131r. Bu bilim adam\u0131n\u0131n birtak\u0131m felsefi ya da ideolojik \u00f6n yarg\u0131lara kap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olabilece\u011fini hi\u00e7 hesaba katmamaktad\u0131r. Oysa bilim adamlar\u0131n\u0131n bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc, sahip olduklar\u0131 baz\u0131 \u00f6n yarg\u0131lar\u0131 ya da ba\u011fl\u0131 olduklar\u0131 felsefi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri, bilimsel bir g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm alt\u0131nda topluma empoze eden sapk\u0131nlard\u0131r. \u00d6rne\u011fin, tesad\u00fcflerin karma\u015fa ve d\u00fczensizlikten ba\u015fka bir \u015fey olu\u015fturamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zleriyle g\u00f6rd\u00fckleri halde, evrendeki ve canl\u0131lardaki yap\u0131lar\u0131n, plan ve d\u00fczenin tesad\u00fcfler sonucu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunulmaktad\u0131r. S\u00f6z gelimi bu t\u00fcr bir biyolog, canl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yap\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131 olan bir protein molek\u00fcl\u00fcnde hayranl\u0131k uyand\u0131ran bir d\u00fczen oldu\u011funu ve bu d\u00fczenin tesad\u00fcflerle olu\u015fma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 rahatl\u0131kla anlayacakt\u0131r. Ama buna ra\u011fmen, proteinin, milyarlarca y\u0131l \u00f6nce ilkel d\u00fcnya \u015fartlar\u0131nda rastlant\u0131lar sonucu meydana geldi\u011fi iddias\u0131ndad\u0131r. Bununla da kalmaz, yaln\u0131zca bir de\u011fil, milyonlarca proteinin tesad\u00fcflerle olu\u015fup, sonra hayranl\u0131k verici bir plan ve d\u00fczen i\u00e7inde bir araya gelerek ilk canl\u0131 h\u00fccreyi olu\u015fturduklar\u0131n\u0131 da \u00e7ekinmeden iddias\u0131na katmakta ve bunu \u0131srarla savunmaktad\u0131r. \u0130\u015fte bahsetti\u011fimiz ki\u015fi “evrimci” bir bilim adam\u0131d\u0131r. Oysa ayn\u0131 bilim adam\u0131n\u0131n, bo\u015f bir arazide y\u00fcr\u00fcrken \u00fcst \u00fcste dizilmi\u015f \u00fc\u00e7 tu\u011fla g\u00f6rse, bunlar\u0131n tesad\u00fcfen meydana gelip, sonra yine tesad\u00fcfen \u00fcst \u00fcste dizildiklerine asla ihtimal vermemesi laz\u0131md\u0131r. Hatta b\u00f6yle bir \u015fey iddia eden kimsenin akl\u0131ndan bile ku\u015fkulan\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Peki, s\u0131radan olaylar\u0131 normal de\u011ferlendirebilen bu insanlar, konu kendilerinin nas\u0131l var oldu\u011fu?<\/em> sorusunu ara\u015ft\u0131rmaya gelince, nas\u0131l olup da bu denli ak\u0131l d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir tutuma kay\u0131lmaktad\u0131r? Elbette, bu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n bilim ad\u0131na oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek imk\u00e2ns\u0131zd\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc bilimsel d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye g\u00f6re, e\u011fer bir olay\u0131n iki muhtemel nedeni varsa, her iki ihtimal \u00fczerinde de d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmek laz\u0131md\u0131r. E\u011fer iki ihtimalden birisi di\u011ferinden \u00e7ok daha d\u00fc\u015f\u00fckse, \u00f6rne\u011fin y\u00fczde 1 ise, bu durumda ak\u0131lc\u0131 ve bilimsel olan hi\u00e7 ku\u015fkusuz ki y\u00fczde 99 olan di\u011fer ihtimal \u00fczerinde yo\u011funla\u015fmakt\u0131r. Bu bilimsel \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcy\u00fc ak\u0131lda tutarak soral\u0131m: Canl\u0131lar\u0131n bu d\u00fcnya \u00fczerinde nas\u0131l ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen iki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f vard\u0131r. Birincisi, t\u00fcm canl\u0131lar\u0131, \u015fu an sahip olduklar\u0131 kompleks yap\u0131lar\u0131yla Allah’\u0131n yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130kincisi ise, canl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilin\u00e7siz tesad\u00fcfler sonucunda meydana \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130\u015fte bu ikincisi, evrim teorisinin iddias\u0131d\u0131r. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Bilimsel verilere, \u00f6rne\u011fin molek\u00fcler biyolojiye bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda ise, tek bir canl\u0131 h\u00fccrenin, hatta onda bulunan milyonlarca proteinden tek bir tanesinin bile, evrimin savundu\u011fu \u015fekilde tesad\u00fcfler sonucu olu\u015fmas\u0131na ihtimal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda, canl\u0131lar\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen evrimci g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn do\u011fru olma ihtimali s\u0131f\u0131rd\u0131r. O halde, birinci g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn do\u011fru olma ihtimali “y\u00fczde y\u00fcz”d\u00fcr. Yani, canl\u0131l\u0131k bilin\u00e7li bir bi\u00e7imde yarat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00fcm canl\u0131 varl\u0131klar, \u00fcst\u00fcn bir g\u00fc\u00e7, bilgi ve ak\u0131l sahibi olan Allah’\u0131n yaratmas\u0131yla var olmu\u015flard\u0131r. Bu ger\u00e7ek yaln\u0131zca bir inan\u00e7 bi\u00e7imi de\u011fil, ak\u0131l ve bilimin vard\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortak hakikattir. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Elbette bu ger\u00e7ek kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, evrimci bilim adamlar\u0131n\u0131n bu iddias\u0131ndan b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle vazge\u00e7mesi, a\u00e7\u0131k ve ispatlanm\u0131\u015f ger\u00e7e\u011fe teslim olmas\u0131 akl\u0131n ve vicdan\u0131n icab\u0131d\u0131r. Aksine bir davran\u0131\u015f, kendisinin “bilim adam\u0131” olmaktan \u00e7ok, bilimi felsefesine, ideolojisine ve dogmatik inan\u00e7lar\u0131na alet eden bir ki\u015fi oldu\u011funu kan\u0131tlayacakt\u0131r. Oysa b\u00fct\u00fcn bunlara ra\u011fmen s\u00f6z konusu evrimci “bilim adam\u0131”n\u0131n, ger\u00e7eklerle y\u00fczle\u015fti\u011fi her durumda, \u00f6fkesi, inad\u0131 ve \u00f6n yarg\u0131lar\u0131 bir kat daha artmaktad\u0131r. Onun bu tutumu tek bir kelimeyle a\u00e7\u0131klanabilir: “\u0130nan\u00e7” … Ama b\u00e2t\u0131l bir inan\u00e7! Zira, ger\u00e7eklerle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya geldi\u011fi halde, bunlara g\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc kapay\u0131p, hayalinde kurdu\u011fu ak\u0131l d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir senaryoya \u00f6m\u00fcr boyu ba\u011flanman\u0131n ba\u015fka bir a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 olamaz.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Bilimin Kayna\u011f\u0131 ve Darwin Kafas\u0131!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Evrimci d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin k\u00f6keni, yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f ger\u00e7e\u011fini reddeden dogmatik bir inan\u00e7 olarak antik \u00e7a\u011flara dek uzan\u0131r. Eski Yunan’daki ateist felsefecilerin \u00e7o\u011fu evrim fikrini savunmu\u015flard\u0131r. Felsefe tarihine bir g\u00f6z att\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda da, evrim d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinin pek \u00e7ok ateist felsefenin bel kemi\u011fini olu\u015fturdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Modern bilimin do\u011fmas\u0131 ve geli\u015fmesinde ise, bu antik ateist felsefenin de\u011fil, Allah inanc\u0131n\u0131n ve \u00f6zellikle \u0130slam’\u0131n te\u015fvik edici rol\u00fc vard\u0131r. Modern bilime \u00f6nc\u00fcl\u00fck edenlerin \u00e7ok b\u00fcy\u00fck b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc Allah’\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na inanan insanlard\u0131r ve bilimsel \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar yaparken de Allah’\u0131n yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 evreni ke\u015ffetme, O’nun kanunlar\u0131n\u0131, yarat\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki detaylar\u0131 g\u00f6rme amac\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Leonardo da Vinci, Kopernik, Keppler, Galilei gibi astronomlar, paleontolojinin babas\u0131 say\u0131lan Cuvier, botani\u011fin ve zoolojinin \u00f6nc\u00fcs\u00fc olan Linnaeus, “ya\u015fam\u0131\u015f en b\u00fcy\u00fck bilim adam\u0131” olarak an\u0131lan Isaac Newton gibi isimler, Allah’\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na, t\u00fcm evrenin ve canl\u0131lar\u0131n O’nun yaratmas\u0131yla var oldu\u011funa inanarak bilim yapm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. 20. y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n en b\u00fcy\u00fck dehas\u0131 say\u0131lan Albert Einstein da yine Allah’a inanan bir bilim adam\u0131d\u0131r ve \u015fu s\u00f6zlerin sahibidir: “Derin bir imana sahip olmayan ger\u00e7ek bir bilim adam\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnemiyorum. Bu durum \u015f\u00f6yle de ifade edilebilir: Dinsiz bir bilime inanmak imk\u00e2ns\u0131zd\u0131r.”<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Modern fizi\u011fin kurucular\u0131ndan \u00fcnl\u00fc Alman fizik\u00e7isi Max Planck ise \u015fu ifadeleri kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r: “Hangi alanda olursa olsun bilimle ciddi \u015fekilde ilgilenen herkes, bilim mabedinin kap\u0131s\u0131ndaki \u015fu yaz\u0131y\u0131 okuyacakt\u0131r: ‘\u0130man et.’ \u0130man, bilim adam\u0131n\u0131n vazge\u00e7emeyece\u011fi bir \u00f6zelliktir.”<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Evrim teorisi ise, antik materyalist felsefelerin yeniden uyand\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131yla g\u00fcndeme gelen ve 19. y\u00fczy\u0131lda yayg\u0131nla\u015fan materyalist felsefenin \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc bir safsatad\u0131r. Materyalizm, ba\u015fta da belirtti\u011fimiz gibi, do\u011fay\u0131 yaln\u0131zca maddi etkenlerle a\u00e7\u0131klamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r. Yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131 en ba\u015ftan reddetti\u011fi i\u00e7in de, canl\u0131 ve cans\u0131z her varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n, hi\u00e7bir yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f olmadan, rastlant\u0131larla ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunulmaktad\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Darwin’in Kas\u0131tl\u0131 Sapt\u0131rmalar\u0131<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc savunuldu\u011fu \u015fekliyle evrim teorisini ortaya atan ki\u015fi, amat\u00f6r bir \u0130ngiliz do\u011fa bilimci olan Charles Robert Darwin adl\u0131 ve Yahudi as\u0131ll\u0131 \u015fah\u0131st\u0131r. Darwin hi\u00e7bir zaman ger\u00e7ek bir biyoloji e\u011fitimi almam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Do\u011fa ve canl\u0131lar konusunda sadece amat\u00f6r bir ilgiye sahip insand\u0131. Bu ilgisinin bir sonucu olarak, 1832 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u0130ngiltere’den yola \u00e7\u0131kan ve be\u015f y\u0131l boyunca d\u00fcnyan\u0131n farkl\u0131 b\u00f6lgelerini gezen H.M.S. Beagle adl\u0131 resmi ke\u015fif gemisinde g\u00f6n\u00fcll\u00fc olarak yer ald\u0131. Gen\u00e7 Darwin, bu gezi s\u0131ras\u0131nda g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc farkl\u0131 canl\u0131 t\u00fcrlerinden, \u00f6zellikle de Galapagos Adalar\u0131’nda g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc farkl\u0131 ispinoz t\u00fcrlerinin etkisinde kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu ku\u015flar\u0131n gagalar\u0131ndaki farklar\u0131n, \u00e7evreye uyum sa\u011flamalar\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceden hareketle canl\u0131lardaki b\u00fct\u00fcn \u00e7e\u015fitlili\u011fin k\u00f6keninde “\u00e7evreye uyum” kavram\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu varsayd\u0131. Darwin bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ile, Allah’\u0131n canl\u0131 t\u00fcrlerini ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ger\u00e7e\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karak, canl\u0131lar\u0131n ortak bir atadan gelerek do\u011fa \u015fartlar\u0131 sonucunda birbirlerinden farkl\u0131la\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 savunmaktayd\u0131. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Darwin bu varsay\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 hi\u00e7bir bilimsel bulgu ya da deneye dayand\u0131rmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ancak Darwin, d\u00f6nemin bilinen materyalist biyologlar\u0131ndan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 destek ve te\u015fviklerle, bu varsay\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 zamanla iddial\u0131 bir teori konumuna ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu teoriye g\u00f6re canl\u0131lar tek bir ilkel atadan geliyorlard\u0131 ama \u00e7ok uzun bir s\u00fcre\u00e7 i\u00e7inde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck de\u011fi\u015fimlere u\u011fram\u0131\u015flard\u0131 ve b\u00f6ylece farkl\u0131la\u015fm\u0131\u015flard\u0131. Ortama en iyi \u015fekilde uyum sa\u011flayanlar\u0131n \u00f6zelliklerini gelecek nesillere aktarm\u0131\u015ft\u0131, b\u00f6ylece bu yararl\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fimlerin zamanla birikerek bireyi, atalar\u0131ndan tamamen farkl\u0131 bir canl\u0131ya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f olmaktayd\u0131. Bu “yararl\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fimler”in k\u00f6keninin ne oldu\u011funu ise bir t\u00fcrl\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klayamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Darwin’e g\u00f6re insan da, bu hayali mekanizman\u0131n en geli\u015fmi\u015f \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcyd\u00fc. Darwin hayal g\u00fcc\u00fcnde canland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu mekanizmaya “do\u011fal seleksiyonla evrim” ad\u0131n\u0131 takm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Art\u0131k, “t\u00fcrlerin k\u00f6keni”ni buldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyordu: Bir t\u00fcr\u00fcn k\u00f6keni ba\u015fka bir t\u00fcrd\u00fc. Bu fikirlerini 1859 y\u0131l\u0131nda T\u00fcrlerin K\u00f6keni adl\u0131 kitab\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Ancak Darwin, teorisinin pek \u00e7ok a\u00e7mazla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya oldu\u011funun fark\u0131ndayd\u0131. Bunlar\u0131 kitab\u0131n\u0131n “Teorinin Zorluklar\u0131” (Difficulties on Theory) adl\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde itiraf ediyordu. Bu “zorluklar\u0131n” ba\u015f\u0131nda, fosil kay\u0131tlar\u0131, canl\u0131lardaki tesad\u00fcfle a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan kompleks organlar (\u00f6rne\u011fin g\u00f6z), canl\u0131lar\u0131n i\u00e7g\u00fcd\u00fcleri gibi konular geliyordu. Darwin bu zorluklar\u0131n ileride yap\u0131lacak yeni ke\u015fiflerle \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclece\u011fini ummu\u015f, baz\u0131lar\u0131na da \u00e7ok yetersiz a\u00e7\u0131klamalar getirmi\u015fti. \u0130ngiliz fizik\u00e7i Henry S. Lipson, Darwin’in bu “zorluklar\u0131” hakk\u0131nda \u015fu yorumu yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n “T\u00fcrlerin K\u00f6keni’ni ilk okudu\u011fumda Darwin’in genelde sunulan tablonun aksine, kendisinden pek de emin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 fark etmi\u015ftim. ‘Teorinin Zorluklar\u0131’ ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm, \u00f6rne\u011fin, \u00e7ok belirgin bir g\u00fcvensizlik yans\u0131tmaktad\u0131r. Bir fizik\u00e7i olarak, g\u00f6z\u00fcn nas\u0131l ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f olabilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki yorumlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda \u015fa\u015fk\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcm.”<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Darwin’in en b\u00fcy\u00fck zorlu\u011fu ise, teorisinin sorunlar\u0131na \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm getirmesini umdu\u011fu bilimin, ger\u00e7ekte bu sorunlar\u0131 dev boyutlara ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 olacakt\u0131. Darwin teorisini geli\u015ftirirken, kendisinden \u00f6nceki pek \u00e7ok evrimci biyologdan, \u00f6zellikle de Frans\u0131z biyolog Lamarck’tan etkilenmi\u015fti. Lamarck’a g\u00f6re canl\u0131lar ya\u015famlar\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda kazand\u0131klar\u0131 \u00f6zellikleri sonraki nesle aktar\u0131yorlar, b\u00f6ylece evrimle\u015fiyorlard\u0131. \u00d6rne\u011fin, z\u00fcrafalar\u0131n ceylan benzeri hayvanlardan t\u00fcrediklerini, y\u00fcksek a\u011fa\u00e7lar\u0131n yapraklar\u0131n\u0131 yemek i\u00e7in \u00e7abalarken nesilden nesile boyunlar\u0131n\u0131n uzad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015fti. Darwin de canl\u0131lar\u0131 evrimle\u015ftiren etken olarak, Lamarck’\u0131n “kazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u00f6zelliklerin aktar\u0131lmas\u0131” tezine ba\u015fvuracakt\u0131. Oysa gerek Lamarck gerekse Darwin yan\u0131l\u0131yorlard\u0131. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc o d\u00f6nemde canl\u0131l\u0131k \u00e7ok ilkel bir teknoloji ile, \u00e7ok yetersiz bir d\u00fczeyde incelenebiliyordu. Genetik, molek\u00fcler biyoloji ve biyokimya gibi bilim dallar\u0131n\u0131n hen\u00fcz adlar\u0131 bile yoktu. Teorileri sadece hayal g\u00fcc\u00fcne dayan\u0131yordu. Daha do\u011frusu o, insanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Dini disiplinden koparmak ve dinsizli\u011fi a\u015f\u0131lamak istiyordu.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Darwin’in kitab\u0131n\u0131n yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 yank\u0131lar s\u00fcrerken Avusturyal\u0131 botanik\u00e7i Gregor Mendel 1865 y\u0131l\u0131nda, kal\u0131t\u0131m kanunlar\u0131n\u0131 ke\u015ffedince Darwinistler \u015fa\u015fk\u0131nl\u0131\u011fa u\u011fram\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Mendel’in y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n sonuna kadar pek duyulmayan ke\u015fifleri 1900’l\u00fc y\u0131llar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda genetik biliminin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131yla \u00f6nem kazanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Yine ayn\u0131 y\u0131llarda genler ve kromozomlar\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ke\u015ffedilmesi Darwinistleri k\u00f6\u015feye s\u0131k\u0131\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. 1950’li y\u0131llarda genetik bilgiyi saklayan DNA molek\u00fcl\u00fcn\u00fcn ke\u015ffi ise Darwinist teoriyi b\u00fcy\u00fck bir krize sokmu\u015f olacakt\u0131. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc hem canl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n Darwin’in sand\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00e7ok daha kompleks oldu\u011fu, hem de Darwin’in \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc evrim mekanizmalar\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131. B\u00fct\u00fcn bu geli\u015fmelerin, Darwin’in teorisini tarihin tozlu raflar\u0131na kald\u0131rmas\u0131 laz\u0131md\u0131. Ancak belli \u00e7evreler \u0131srarla teoriyi yenilemeye ve her ne \u015fekilde olursa olsun bilimsel platforma yerle\u015ftirmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015flard\u0131. B\u00fct\u00fcn bu \u00e7abalar, teorinin ard\u0131nda bilimsel kayg\u0131lardan \u00e7ok ideolojik birtak\u0131m hedeflerin oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan olduk\u00e7a anlaml\u0131yd\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Neo-Darwinizm’in Umutsuz \u00c7abalar\u0131<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Darwin’in teorisi 20. y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n ilk \u00e7eyre\u011finde ke\u015ffedilen genetik kanunlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda tam anlam\u0131yla bir a\u00e7maza girmi\u015f durumdayd\u0131. Bunun \u00fczerine Darwin’e sadakat g\u00f6stermekte kararl\u0131 olan bir grup sapk\u0131n ve saplant\u0131l\u0131 bilim adam\u0131, 1941 y\u0131l\u0131nda Amerikan Jeoloji Derne\u011fi’nin d\u00fczenledi\u011fi bir toplant\u0131da bir araya toplanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131. G. Ledyard Stebbins ve Theodosius Dobzhansky gibi genetik\u00e7ilerin, Ernst Mayr ve Julian Huxley gibi zoologlar\u0131n, George Gaylord Simpson ve Glen L. Jepsen gibi paleontologlar\u0131n uzun tart\u0131\u015fmalar sonucunda vard\u0131klar\u0131 sonu\u00e7, Darwinizm’e yeni bir “yama” yapmak olacakt\u0131. Bu ki\u015filer, Darwin’in iddia etti\u011fi ama a\u00e7\u0131klayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Lamarck’a dayanarak \u00e7\u00f6zmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 “Canl\u0131lar\u0131 s\u00f6zde geli\u015ftiren ve de\u011fi\u015ftiren yararl\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerin kayna\u011f\u0131 nedir?” sorusuna, “Rastgele mutasyonlar” cevab\u0131n\u0131 bulmu\u015flard\u0131. Darwin’in do\u011fal seleksiyon tezine mutasyon kavram\u0131n\u0131n eklenmesiyle ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan bu yeni teoriye de “Modern Sentetik Evrim Teorisi” ad\u0131n\u0131 koymu\u015flard\u0131. K\u0131sa s\u00fcrede bu yeni teori “neo-Darwinizm” olarak tan\u0131nd\u0131 ve teoriyi ortaya atanlar da “neo-Darwinistler” olarak an\u0131lmaya ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n T\u00fcrkiye’de Masonik Medyan\u0131n \u00c7arp\u0131tmalar\u0131<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 29 Mart 2001 tarihli baz\u0131 g\u00fcnl\u00fck gazetelerde evrim teorisi ad\u0131na \u00f6nemli bir itiraf yer al\u0131yordu. “Ku\u015flar dinozorlardan evrimle\u015fti” masal\u0131na delil gibi g\u00f6sterilen “dino-ku\u015f fosili”nin ger\u00e7ekte bir sahtek\u00e2rl\u0131k oldu\u011fu, bir s\u00fcr\u00fcngen omurgas\u0131na ku\u015f iskeleti par\u00e7alar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131yla \u00fcretildi\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131. \u00d6rne\u011fin H\u00fcrriyet gazetesinin “D\u0130NO-KU\u015e PALAVRA \u00c7IKTI” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 haberinde \u015f\u00f6yle yaz\u0131yordu:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n “National Geographic dergisinin Kas\u0131m 1999’da ku\u015f ile dinozor aras\u0131ndaki eksik halka oldu\u011funu duyurdu\u011fu, hakk\u0131nda bilimsel makaleler yaz\u0131lan hayvan\u0131n sahte oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. ‘Archoeoraptor liaoningensis’ ad\u0131 verilen hindi b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcndeki dino-ku\u015fun iskeletinin ba\u015fka hayvanlara ait kemiklerden bir araya getirildi\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Evrim teorisinde \u00f6nemli bir eksikli\u011fi ayd\u0131nlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 varsay\u0131lan dino-ku\u015fun 125 milyon y\u0131l \u00f6ncesine ait oldu\u011fu, \u00c7in’in Liaoning eyaletinde bulundu\u011fu \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcyordu. T\u00fcyl\u00fc v\u00fccudu bir ku\u015fa benziyor, ancak uzun, kemikli kuyru\u011fu et t\u00fcketen dinozorlar\u0131 \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131yordu. \u0130ngiliz haftal\u0131k bilim dergisi Nature’de yay\u0131nlanan bir inceleme dino-ku\u015fun palavra oldu\u011funu g\u00f6zler \u00f6n\u00fcne serdi.<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Oysa bu sahte fosil, bundan 2 y\u0131l \u00f6nce ba\u015fta H\u00fcrriyet ve Sabah olmak \u00fczere Darwinist medya kurulu\u015flar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan “Evrim teorisini kan\u0131tlayan delil bulundu” diye tan\u0131t\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. H\u00fcrriyet gazetesinde yay\u0131nlanan 16 Ekim 1999 tarihli “U\u00e7an Dinozor Bulundu” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 haber, b\u00f6yle bir sahtek\u00e2rl\u0131kt\u0131. Maalesef, evrimciler, Sinosauropteryx<\/em> hakk\u0131ndaki spek\u00fclasyonlar\u0131n\u0131n bo\u015fa \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan, \u015fimdi de Archaeoraptor<\/em>, Sinornithosaurus<\/em> ve Beipiaosaurus<\/em> ad\u0131 verilen yeni fosil bulgular\u0131 \u00fczerinde spek\u00fclasyona ba\u015flam\u0131\u015flard\u0131. Sabah ve H\u00fcrriyet de, evrim konusunda g\u00f6sterdikleri her zamanki \u00f6n yarg\u0131l\u0131 tavr\u0131 tekrar ederek, bu spek\u00fclasyonlar\u0131 hi\u00e7bir farkl\u0131 yorum ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye yer vermeden “evrime delil bulundu” \u00fcslubunda okuyucular\u0131na aktarm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Halbuki, s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen fosilin bir “dino-ku\u015f” fosili olamayaca\u011f\u0131, fosil ilk g\u00fcndeme geldi\u011fi d\u00f6nemde bilimsel delillerle a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu \u00f6rnek, \u00fclkemizdeki evrimci medyan\u0131n ne kadar \u00f6n yarg\u0131l\u0131 ve tarafl\u0131 davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, evrim lehinde gibi g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc her haberi b\u00fcy\u00fck bir h\u0131rsla propaganda malzemesi haline getirdi\u011finin ve bu yolla kamuoyunu yan\u0131ltt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k bir kan\u0131t\u0131yd\u0131. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Evrimcilerin De\u011fi\u015fmeyen Y\u00f6ntemi: Sahtek\u00e2rl\u0131k<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n \u00c7in’deki fosil uydurmacas\u0131, evrimcilerin asl\u0131nda klasik bir y\u00f6nteminin devam\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturmaktayd\u0131. Bu y\u00f6ntem sahtek\u00e2rl\u0131kt\u0131r. Evrim teorisinin ortaya at\u0131lmas\u0131ndan bu yana, teoriyi desteklemek i\u00e7in pek \u00e7ok sahtek\u00e2rl\u0131k yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Alman biyolog Ernst Haeckel, Darwin’i destelemek i\u00e7in sahte embriyo \u00e7izimleri yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130ngiliz evrimciler, insan kafatas\u0131na orangutan \u00e7enesi monte edip, bunu British Museum’da 40 y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n bir s\u00fcre “Piltdown Adam\u0131-Evrimin En B\u00fcy\u00fck Kan\u0131t\u0131”<\/em> diye sunmu\u015flard\u0131. Amerikal\u0131 evrimciler tek bir domuz di\u015fini “Nebraska Adam\u0131” diye yans\u0131tm\u0131\u015flard\u0131. Amerikal\u0131 kimyac\u0131 Stanley Miller sahte bir “ilkel atmosfer modeli” olu\u015fturup amino asit deneyi yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. D\u00fcnyan\u0131n d\u00f6rt bir yan\u0131nda, “rekonstr\u00fcksiyon” ad\u0131 verilen sahte \u00e7izimlerle, ger\u00e7ekte hi\u00e7bir zaman ya\u015famam\u0131\u015f olan “ilkel yarat\u0131klar” <\/em>veya “maymun adam”lar <\/em>uydurmu\u015flard\u0131. \u00c7in’de “bulundu\u011fu” iddia edilen ve “ku\u015flar\u0131n evrimine b\u00fcy\u00fck delil”<\/em> gibi g\u00f6sterilen “Archoeoraptor”<\/em> fosili sahtek\u00e2rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise, evrimci sahtek\u00e2rl\u0131klar zincirinin son halkas\u0131yd\u0131. G\u00f6r\u00fclen odur ki, evrimciler yalan uydurmaktan, bilimi ideolojileri u\u011fruna \u00e7arp\u0131tmaktan medet ummaktalard\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Din D\u00fc\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na, Darwinizm K\u0131l\u0131f\u0131!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n 2001 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n ilk aylar\u0131nda bulunan 3.5 milyon y\u0131ll\u0131k kafatas\u0131, evrimcilerin hayali “insan\u0131n evrimi soya\u011fac\u0131”<\/em>n\u0131 bo\u015fa \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. D\u00fcnyan\u0131n en \u00f6nde gelen evrimcilerinin dahi hayali \u015femalar\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir yere koyamad\u0131klar\u0131 bu fosili, Ak\u015fam gazetesi nas\u0131l olduysa hayali evrim \u015femas\u0131nda bir yere konumland\u0131rm\u0131\u015f ve bunu 22 Mart 2001 tarihli say\u0131s\u0131nda okuyucular\u0131na duyurmu\u015flard\u0131. S\u00f6z konusu fosil Kenya’da Meave Leakey ve ekibi taraf\u0131ndan bulunmu\u015ftu. D\u00fcz bir y\u00fcze sahip olmas\u0131 nedeniyle “D\u00fcz Y\u00fczl\u00fc Adam”<\/em> (Flat Faced Man) olarak an\u0131lan fosile verilen “bilimsel isim” ise Kenyanthropus platyops<\/em> tak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. 3,5 milyon y\u0131ll\u0131k bu fosilin evrimcilerin akl\u0131n\u0131 tamamen kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131n nedeni, kendisinden sonra ya\u015fam\u0131\u015f olan baz\u0131 maymun t\u00fcrlerinin (Lucy gibi), evrimci k\u0131staslara g\u00f6re Kenyanthropus platyops’dan daha “geri” olmas\u0131yd\u0131. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla farkl\u0131 \u00f6zelliklere sahip olan bu fosil, evrimcilerin t\u00fcm \u015femas\u0131n\u0131 bo\u015fa \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc bu fosili nereye yerle\u015ftireceklerini bilmiyorlard\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Asl\u0131nda bug\u00fcne kadar bulunan fosillerin tamam\u0131na bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, maymunla ortak bir atadan evrimle\u015fen, yava\u015f yava\u015f insana do\u011fru y\u00fckselen bir “evrim \u015femas\u0131” olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Aksine \u015femada tamamen bir karma\u015fa bulunmaktayd\u0131. BBC televizyonunun internet sayfas\u0131nda yay\u0131nlanan ve bir sonraki sayfada yer alan \u015femada bu karma\u015fa vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. “Karma\u015f\u0131k insan\u0131ms\u0131 soya\u011fac\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131yla verilen \u015femada hi\u00e7bir d\u00fczenli geli\u015fme olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, aksine t\u00fcm fosil bulgular\u0131n\u0131n birbirlerinden tamamen ilgisiz \u00f6zelliklere sahip olduklar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktayd\u0131. Zaten \u015feman\u0131n alt\u0131nda da \u015fu yorumu yazm\u0131\u015flard\u0131: <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Bilim adamlar\u0131 farkl\u0131 insan\u0131ms\u0131 fosillerini birbirleriyle ili\u015fkilendirme konusunda g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fck \u00e7ekiyorlard\u0131. <\/span><\/em><\/strong>George Washington \u00dcniversitesi, Antropoloji b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden Daniel E. Lieberman ise, Nature dergisinde yer alan makalesinde, Kenyanthropus platyops<\/em> hakk\u0131nda ku\u015fkular\u0131n\u0131 aktarm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. \u00dcstelik BBC isimli \u00fcnl\u00fc televizyon kanal\u0131 ise haberi: “D\u00fcz Y\u00fczl\u00fc Adam Bir Bilmece”, “Ak\u0131l Kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131ran Tablo”, “Bilimsel \u00c7eli\u015fki” ba\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131 ile yay\u0131nlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Mucize Molek\u00fcl DNA<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Darwinist yalanc\u0131lar i\u00e7in; DNA molek\u00fcllerinin ve amino asitlerin olu\u015fumu hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Proteinlerin olu\u015fumu ise ba\u015fl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131na bir muammad\u0131r. \u00dcstelik, sorun yaln\u0131zca amino asit ve proteinlerle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 kalmaz; bunlar sadece bir ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7t\u0131r. Bunlar\u0131n da \u00f6tesinde as\u0131l olarak, h\u00fccre denen m\u00fckemmel canl\u0131, evrimciler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan dev bir \u00e7\u0131kmaz olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc h\u00fccre yaln\u0131zca amino asit yap\u0131l\u0131 proteinlerden olu\u015fmu\u015f bir y\u0131\u011f\u0131n san\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. H\u00fccre: Y\u00fczlerce geli\u015fmi\u015f sistemi bulunan, insano\u011flunun halen t\u00fcm s\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6zemedi\u011fi karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131kta bir canl\u0131d\u0131r. Oysa evrimciler, de\u011fil bu sistemlerin, h\u00fccrenin yap\u0131 ta\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n bile nas\u0131l meydana geldiklerini a\u00e7\u0131klayamamaktad\u0131r. Canl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n k\u00f6kenini rastlant\u0131larla a\u00e7\u0131klama gayretindeki evrim teorisi, h\u00fccredeki en temel molek\u00fcllerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na bile tutarl\u0131 bir izah getirememi\u015fken, genetik bilimindeki ilerlemeler ve n\u00fckleik asitlerin, yani DNA ve RNA’n\u0131n ke\u015ffi, bu as\u0131ls\u0131z teori i\u00e7in yepyeni \u00e7\u0131kmazlara yol a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 1955 y\u0131l\u0131nda James Watson ve Francis Crick adl\u0131 iki bilim adam\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 DNA’n\u0131n son derece kompleks yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 ve yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcn \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131karm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n V\u00fccuttaki 100 trilyon h\u00fccrenin hemen her birinin \u00e7ekirde\u011finde bulunan DNA adl\u0131 molek\u00fcl, insan v\u00fccudunun eksiksiz bir yap\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131r. Bir insana ait b\u00fct\u00fcn \u00f6zelliklerin bilgisi, d\u0131\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcnden i\u00e7 organlar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lar\u0131na kadar DNA’n\u0131n i\u00e7inde \u00f6zel bir \u015fifre sistemiyle kay\u0131tl\u0131d\u0131r. DNA’daki bilgi, bu molek\u00fcl\u00fc olu\u015fturan d\u00f6rt \u00f6zel molek\u00fcl\u00fcn dizili\u015f s\u0131ras\u0131 ile kodlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. N\u00fckleotid (veya baz) ad\u0131 verilen bu molek\u00fcller, isimlerinin ba\u015f harfleri olan A, T, G, C ile anlat\u0131l\u0131r. \u0130nsanlar aras\u0131ndaki t\u00fcm yap\u0131sal farklar, bu harflerin dizili\u015f s\u0131ralamalar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki farktan do\u011fmaktad\u0131r. Bu, d\u00f6rt harfli bir alfabeden olu\u015fan bir t\u00fcr bilgi bankas\u0131d\u0131r. DNA’daki harflerin dizili\u015f s\u0131ras\u0131, insan\u0131n v\u00fccut yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 en ince ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131na dek belirleyen unsurlard\u0131r. Boy, g\u00f6z, sa\u00e7 ve cilt rengi gibi \u00f6zelliklerin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, v\u00fccuttaki 206 kemi\u011fin, 600 kas\u0131n, 10 bin i\u015fitme siniri a\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 2 milyon optik sinir a\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 100 milyar sinir h\u00fccresinin ve 100 trilyon h\u00fccrenin planlar\u0131 tek bir h\u00fccrenin DNA’s\u0131nda sakl\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. E\u011fer DNA’daki bu genetik bilgiyi k\u00e2\u011f\u0131da d\u00f6kmeye kalksak, yakla\u015f\u0131k 500’er sayfal\u0131k 900 ciltten olu\u015fan dev bir k\u00fct\u00fcphane olu\u015fturmam\u0131z laz\u0131md\u0131r. Ama bu inan\u0131lmaz hacimdeki bilgi, DNA’n\u0131n “gen” ad\u0131 verilen par\u00e7alar\u0131nda \u015fifrelenmi\u015f durumdad\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n DNA’n\u0131n tesad\u00fcfen olu\u015faca\u011f\u0131na inanmak, bir maymunun tek ba\u015f\u0131na en m\u00fckemmel bilgisayar\u0131 yapaca\u011f\u0131na inanmaktan daha ahmak\u00e7ad\u0131r!<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Burada dikkat edilmesi gereken bir nokta vard\u0131r. Bir geni olu\u015fturan n\u00fckleotidlerde meydana gelecek bir s\u0131ralama hatas\u0131, o geni tamamen i\u015fe yaramaz hale sokacakt\u0131r. \u0130nsan v\u00fccudunda yakla\u015f\u0131k 30 bin gen bulundu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcl\u00fcrse, bu genleri olu\u015fturan milyonlarca n\u00fckleotidin do\u011fru s\u0131ralamada tesad\u00fcfen olu\u015fabilmelerinin kesinlikle imk\u00e2ns\u0131z oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Evrimci bir biyolog olan Frank Salisbury bu imk\u00e2ns\u0131zl\u0131kla ilgili olarak \u015funlar\u0131 aktarmaktad\u0131r:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n “Orta b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fckteki bir protein molek\u00fcl\u00fc, yakla\u015f\u0131k 300 amino asit i\u00e7erir. Bunu kontrol eden DNA zincirinde ise, yakla\u015f\u0131k 1000 n\u00fckleotid bulunacakt\u0131r. Bir DNA zincirinde d\u00f6rt \u00e7e\u015fit n\u00fckleotid bulundu\u011fu hat\u0131rlan\u0131rsa, 1000 n\u00fckleotidlik bir dizi, 41000<\/sup><\/span> farkl\u0131 \u015fekilde olabilecektir. K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir logaritma hesab\u0131yla bulunan bu rakam ise, akl\u0131n kavrama s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok \u00f6tesindedir.” <\/span><\/em><\/strong>41000<\/sup><\/span>’de bir, “k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir logaritma hesab\u0131” sonucunda, 10620<\/sup><\/span>’de bir anlam\u0131na gelir. Bu say\u0131 10’un yan\u0131na 620 s\u0131f\u0131r eklenmesiyle elde edilir. 10’un yan\u0131nda 11 tane s\u0131f\u0131r 1 trilyonu ifade ederken, 620 tane s\u0131f\u0131rl\u0131 bir rakam\u0131n ger\u00e7ekten de kavranmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n N\u00fckleotidlerin tesad\u00fcfen bir araya gelerek RNA ve DNA’y\u0131 olu\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n imkans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda, evrimci Frans\u0131z bilim adam\u0131 Paul Auger de \u015fu itirafta bulunmaktad\u0131r: <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n “Rastgele kimyasal olaylar sayesinde n\u00fckleotidler gibi karma\u015f\u0131k molek\u00fcllerin ortaya \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131 konusunda bence iki a\u015famay\u0131 net bir bi\u00e7imde birbirinden ay\u0131rmam\u0131z gerekir; tek tek n\u00fckleotidlerin \u00fcretilmesi -ki bu belki m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilir- ve bunlar\u0131n \u00e7ok \u00f6zel seriler halinde birbirine ba\u011flanmas\u0131. \u0130\u015fte bu ikincisi, olanaks\u0131zd\u0131r.”<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Uzun y\u0131llar molek\u00fcler evrim teorisine inanan Francis Crick bile DNA’y\u0131 ke\u015ffettikten sonra, b\u00f6ylesine kompleks bir molek\u00fcl\u00fcn tesad\u00fcfen, kendi kendine, bir evrim s\u00fcreci neticesinde olu\u015famayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 itiraf etmi\u015f ve \u015f\u00f6yle demi\u015ftir: “Bug\u00fcnk\u00fc mevcut bilgilerin \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda d\u00fcr\u00fcst bir adam ancak \u015funu s\u00f6yleyebilir: Bir anlamda hayat mucizevi bir \u015fekilde ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Evrimci Prof. Dr. Ali Demirsoy da, DNA’n\u0131n meydana gelmesi hakk\u0131nda \u015fu itiraf\u0131 yapmak zorunda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r: “Bir proteinin ve \u00e7ekirdek asidinin (DNA-RNA) olu\u015fma ihtimali tahminlerin \u00e7ok \u00f6tesinde bir olas\u0131l\u0131kt\u0131r. Hatta belirli bir protein zincirinin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kma ihtimali astronomik denecek kadar azd\u0131r.”<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Bu noktada \u00e7ok ilgin\u00e7 bir ikilem daha vard\u0131r: DNA, yaln\u0131z protein yap\u0131s\u0131ndaki birtak\u0131m enzimlerin yard\u0131m\u0131 ile e\u015flenebilir. Ama bu enzimlerin sentezi de ancak DNA’daki bilgiler do\u011frultusunda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir. Birbirine ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131 olduklar\u0131ndan, e\u015flemenin meydana gelebilmesi i\u00e7in ikisinin de ayn\u0131 anda var olmalar\u0131 gerekir. Amerikal\u0131 mikrobiyolog Homer Jacobson, bu konuda \u015f\u00f6yle demektedir:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n “\u0130lk canl\u0131n\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 zaman, \u00fcreme planlar\u0131n\u0131n, \u00e7evreden madde ve enerji sa\u011flaman\u0131n, b\u00fcy\u00fcme s\u0131ras\u0131n\u0131n, bilgileri b\u00fcy\u00fcmeye \u00e7evirecek mekanizmalar\u0131n tamam\u0131na ait emirlerin o anda ve bir arada bulunmalar\u0131 gerekmektedir. Bunlar\u0131n hepsinin kombinasyonu tesad\u00fcfen ger\u00e7ekle\u015femez.”<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Yukar\u0131daki ifadeler, James Watson ve Francis Crick taraf\u0131ndan DNA’n\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131ndan iki y\u0131l sonra yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak bilimdeki t\u00fcm geli\u015fmelere ra\u011fmen, bu sorun evrimciler i\u00e7in h\u00e2l\u00e2 \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcms\u00fcz bir karma\u015fad\u0131r. Alman bilim adamlar\u0131 Reinhard Junker ve Siegfried Scherer de canl\u0131l\u0131k i\u00e7in gerekli molek\u00fcllerin hepsinin sentezinin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ko\u015fullar gerektirdi\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekerler. Bu ise, Junker ve Scherer’e g\u00f6re, ya\u015fam i\u00e7in gereken bir\u00e7ok farkl\u0131 maddenin bir araya gelme ihtimalinin hi\u00e7 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kan\u0131t\u0131d\u0131r.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n “Kimyasal evrim i\u00e7in gerekli t\u00fcm molek\u00fcllerin elde edilece\u011fi bir deney bilinmiyor. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00e7e\u015fitli molek\u00fcllerin de\u011fi\u015fik yerlerde \u00e7ok uygun ko\u015fullarda \u00fcretilip, hidroliz ve fotoliz gibi zararl\u0131 etmenlere kar\u015f\u0131 korunup, yeni bir reaksiyon b\u00f6lgesine ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Burada tesad\u00fcften bahsedilemez, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc b\u00f6yle bir olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ihtimali yoktur.”<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n K\u0131sacas\u0131 evrim teorisi, molek\u00fcler d\u00fczeyde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi iddia edilen evrimsel olu\u015fumlardan hi\u00e7birisini ispatlayabilmi\u015f de\u011fildir. Bilimin ilerlemesi ise bu sorulara cevap \u00fcretmek bir yana, sorular\u0131 daha da kompleks ve i\u00e7inden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lamaz hale getirmektedir. Ama evrimciler, t\u00fcm bu imk\u00e2ns\u0131z senaryolara b\u00fcy\u00fck birer bilimsel ger\u00e7ek gibi inanmaktad\u0131rlar. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131 kabul etmemek i\u00e7in kendilerini \u015fartland\u0131rm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r ve bu durumda imk\u00e2ns\u0131za inanmaktan ba\u015fka se\u00e7enekleri yoktur. Avustralyal\u0131 \u00fcnl\u00fc molek\u00fcler biyolog Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (Evrim: Kriz \u0130\u00e7inde Bir Teori)<\/em> adl\u0131 kitab\u0131nda bu durumu \u015f\u00f6yle anlat\u0131r:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n “Y\u00fcksek organizmalar\u0131n genetik programlar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131, milyarlarca bit (bilgisayar birimi) bilgiye ya da bin ciltlik k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir k\u00fct\u00fcphanenin i\u00e7indeki t\u00fcm harflerin dizilimine e\u015fde\u011ferdir. Bu denli kompleks organizmalar\u0131 olu\u015fturan trilyonlarca h\u00fccrenin geli\u015fimini belirleyen, emreden ve kontrol eden say\u0131s\u0131z karma\u015f\u0131k i\u015flevin tamamen rastlant\u0131ya dayal\u0131 bir s\u00fcre\u00e7 sonucunda olu\u015ftu\u011funu iddia etmek ise, insan akl\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir sald\u0131r\u0131 ve kas\u0131tl\u0131 bir ink\u00e2rd\u0131r!”<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u00a0 DARW\u0130N\u0130ZM YUTTURMACASI VE D\u0130NDAR ERDO\u011eAN’IN DUYARSIZLI\u011eI! \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 10 Nisan 2001 tarihinde Rahmetli Erbakan Hocam\u0131z\u0131n dolayl\u0131 te\u015fvikleriyle ANAP Diyarbak\u0131r Milletvekili Sebgetullah Seydao\u011flu, Milli E\u011fitim Bakan\u0131’n\u0131n yan\u0131tlamas\u0131 i\u00e7in Meclis Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na bir soru \u00f6nergesi sunmu\u015flard\u0131. “21. y\u00fczy\u0131lda, Lise ve Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim kurumlar\u0131nda 19. y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n k\u00f6hne iddialar\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren Darwinizm felsefesinin \u00f6\u011fretilmesi bilime ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir gericilik de\u011fil midir?” diye sormu\u015flard\u0131. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[98],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6246","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ozel-yazilar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6246","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6246"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6246\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.millicozum.com\/mc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}