THE ORIGINS OF THE HOSILITY AGAINST ABDULHAMID

THE ORIGINS OF THE HOSILITY AGAINST ABDULHAMID

The İYİ Party executive staff and their supporting writers’ team specifically and consciously uncovered their annoyance against “Sultan Abdulhamid Han”. We doubt that this could be perhaps due to a masked and vicious hostility to Islam found within them. Or were they struggling only to benefit the Zionist Jews who served the purpose of founding Israel after overthrowing Sultan Abdulhamid? Or did they have a partnership with the Zionist centres that are currently trying to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque? Finally, published in the Official Gazette and repeatedly objected to in our Milli Çözüm Magazine making references to Abdulhamid Han again under the pretext of “Censorship Law” and spewing out their grudge revealed that this unfortunate attitude was caused by far deeper and more sinister enmities. And having no connection at all, trying to wear down Recep Tayyip Erdoğan by comparing him to Sultan Abdulhamid once in a while, if not due to a deliberate plan, it was then definitely an approach of stupidity!.. Because comparing Erdoğan with Abdulhamid Han would give Erdoğan legitimacy and an increase in his votes. Is it a matter of whether the opposition politics was in the hands of poor people who had no understanding of this fact or were these people working for Erdoğan and trying to draw the attention of Israel?

The Islamist (religious abuser) groups who play the role of religious heroes and try to taunt Atatürk at every opportunity, via their supporters by covering their hypocrisy and disparity and those unsound ones who seem to support Atatürk, need to learn and be ashamed of Mustafa Kemal’s Palestinian sensitivities. Moreover, Atatürk explained this historic decision “by realizing what this courageous and resilient ups would cost him and by risking his life, he explained that he will never consent to the establishment of a Jewish State and, as the Islamic world they will stand against the Crusading Westerners in the Palestinian region and the holy trust of our Prophet.” Furthermore, Atatürk had made these warnings in the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM) and had them published in the Hakimiyet-i Milliye newspaper, which was considered a semi-official state organ of the period. Already immediately after that, although it was banned in the medical world, his illness was exacerbated by doctors who made him take “saligran” pills as medication and so, by increasing the dose. Finally, upon realizing this fact, he said: “Entrust me to Turkish doctors!”

Atatürk’s warning (referring to Palestine) ‘We are always ready to shed our blood for this land.’

In his book ‘Nutuk’, Mustafa Kemal emphasized the following historical facts about Palestine: “No one knows the confusion and discontent that exists among the Arabs as much as we do. Unfortunately, we have been away from the Arabs for a few years. But now that we have enough confidence and knowledge of our might, we will prevent the sacred places of Islam from entering the influence of the Jews and Christians. Therefore, we want to say that we will not allow these places to become the playground of European imperialism. Until now, we have been accused of being “irreligious and slack of Islam”. But despite these accusations, we are ready to shed our blood today in the direction of the Prophet’s last wish, that is, to ensure that the holy lands will always remain under Islamic rule. Today, by the grace of Allah, we are strong enough to declare that we will not allow foreign domination and influence to be on the throne of the lands that our Fathers fought for with the Christians, under the rule of Selâhaddin.” With his words, “We do not doubt that the whole Islamic world will uprise and take action at the first step Europe will take to occupy and embezzle these holy places” he also gave signs that he could mobilize the Islamic world if necessary.

Mustafa Kemal’s providing great support to the Mufti of Jerusalem of the time!

Mustafa Kemal Pasha had always supported the first Palestinian leader before Yasser Arafat, Mufti of Jerusalem Haji Emin al-Hüseyni who participated in the Battle of Çanakkale and served in the Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa (Special Organization). After Atatürk’s death, the British abandoned their promises to al-Hüseyni and their plan to share the land and openly took a stand on Israel’s side. After that, successive steps were taken towards the establishment of the Israeli state in Palestine. It is now better understood that in the British compromising attitude towards the Arabs in the sharing of Palestine, Atatürk’s foreign policy and his full support for the Mufti of Jerusalem, al-Hüseyni had a great influence.

Now we ask; Does your opposition to Abdulhamid and arrogance mean supporting Israel against Palestine?

Plans to Demolish the Masjid Al-Aqsa and the Zionists’ Opposition to Abdulhamid!

The Messianic Plan was conceived by Jewish Kabbalists who were engaged in feverish mystical work in Spain in the 14th and 15th centuries. The plan intended the prophecies written in the scripture to be made true by the hands of the Jews themselves, for a world under Jewish domination. The first prophecy, “the spread of Jews all over the world” was implemented by the “exile of Spain”, provoked by the Cabalists themselves. Another Kabbalist, Christopher Columbus, who sailed to unknown seas at the time the exile began, aimed to fulfil another part of the plan with the support of other Kabbalist friends; it was both to explore another part of the world for the “spread” of Jews and to turn this new land into a power centre for Jews. The prophecy about the dispersion of the Jews around the world was largely completed by the 1650s with the interventions of Kabbalists such as Menasseh Ben Israel.

While the part of the Messianic Plan related to this prophecy was continuing, on the one hand, its strategic direction was being implemented. This strategic direction was mainly aimed at eliminating the hostile forces in front of the Zionist Jews. Zionist Jews had to eliminate the forces that denied that the Holy Land of Palestine belonged to Zionist Jews, and did not consider they were good. Without doing this, it would also be impossible for them to fulfil the second great prophecy, that is, to return to the Holy Land from all over the world where they were scattered. The top force they had to eliminate was the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church which considers the Jews as “The killers of Jesus” and does not fully recognize its claims of rights over the Holy Land and their teachings related to “The Chosen People”, was the biggest obstacle to a future Jewish dominance. The Jews would have influence in the rule of Europe only if they destroyed the authority of the Church, and in this case, they would use Europe to return themselves to the Holy Lands and to remove the Holy Lands from Islamic domination.

The Masonic Templars and the Jews had made an Alliance for this purpose. To destroy the Church, they first formed some anti-Papal Christian movements; John Wycliffe and John Huss were two of these prominent figures. After these works, they introduced Humanism as a more radical change. All the great Humanists who produced a worldview against the church doctrine were people who had an extraordinary interest in Kabbalah and adhered to the Templar tradition. Humanism was followed by the Renaissance and, more importantly, the Reformation. The most important goal of the Reform movement, which was directly produced by the Zionist Alliance, was to destroy the political power of the Catholic Church.

The age of Enlightenment following the Reformation and movements against the Church such as the French Revolution and the establishment of the Italian nation-state had almost completely removed the Pope’s political power. As a result of this long struggle, the Catholic Order functioning under the authority of the Church in the West was destroyed and replaced by The New Secular Order (Novus Ordo Seclorum). This was the proof that “the West became eligible for the Messianic Plan”. As a matter of fact, the Kabbalists then initiated the second great prophecy, that is, the return of the Jews to the Holy Lands, in other words, the “Gathering of the Exiles”. The movement of Political Zionism, formulated by Kabbalists, at the end of the 19th century, was attempted to be implemented by racist and secular Jews following the path of the Kabbalists.

However, to return to the Holy Land, first of all, the Ottoman rule there had to be abolished. The Zionists tried to negotiate with the Ottomans first, but Caliph Abdulhamid‘s harsh reaction forced them to look for more precise solutions. In order to overthrow Sultan Abdulhamid, the secular and nationalist opposition groups that grew against him within the borders of the Empire were organized and supported by Jews living in Thessaloniki and by Masonic lodges. And after the Caliph was dethroned, events accelerated one after another. Masons and Zionist centres seized power with a military coup and, by using pashas who were looking for an excuse to fight because of their severe ambition led the Empire into World War I and forced the Empire to fight Britain on the Palestinian front, leaving the Holy Lands under British rule.

When Palestine came under British rule and the establishment of a “Jewish homeland” there was spoken, Zionism accelerated the preparation for the coming of the Messiah, that is, the Gathering of Exiles. However, there was a problem, the “exiles”, especially the European Jews, who were in a comfortable condition, were not very willing to return to Palestine. In order to solve this problem, there would be covert cooperation with the increasingly rising far-right and racist movements in Europe. Because these extreme and skulduggery movements wanted to create “racial purity” in their own countries, and therefore they thought that it was necessary to deport minorities, especially Jews. Since the Zionists also wanted to take these Jews to Palestine, an unbidden parallelism was established between the two sides. This parallelism turned into an alliance, and with the cooperation of Nazi Germany, a huge increase in migration to Palestine was achieved. The antisemitic propaganda used by the Nazis to expel Jews was used as an indoctrination to the Jews of the whole world that the diaspora was not reliable. Towards the end of World War II, the Genocide fairy tale produced as an important psychological pressure for both Jews and non-Jews to approve of migration to the Holy Lands.

Everything happened as in the prophecies. The Jews had moved to Palestine through the nations that voluntarily helped in this work and had established a state here. In 1967, they had occupied the whole of Jerusalem, hence the site of the Temple of Solomon, after a gap of 19 centuries. While these things were happening on the Palestinian front, the Zionists were gradually increasing their control over the United States, which was heading towards becoming the world’s largest political and military power. Thanks to its Puritan heritage, America was extremely suitable to come under the rule. To fully establish this sovereignty, they established various organizations within America. They carried masonry from the Old World to America. Meanwhile, by making another interesting manoeuvre, they had turned America, which had not decamped outside its own continent, into an imperial power, forcing it to “spread out”. To fuel American imperialism and keep it under control, at the beginning of the century they created the CFR. Apart from this organization, which aims to turn American foreign policy into a “subcontractor” for Jewish leaders, in the second half of the century, they structured various lobbying institutions, especially AIPAC, to oversee American support for Israel. Their influence increased so much that eventually, America began to be ruled by a “non-goyim” government, that is, a secret Jewish network.

The two “non-goyim” governments of the world, namely Israel and the USA, in the 20th century, they had also started a major war in the Third World. Because the peoples of the Third World formed a natural opposition to this Zionist World Order. Dictators who subjected their own people to torture and genocide were put in charge in the Third World countries, civil wars were provoked. This was, in a sense, the preparation of the earth for the coming of the Messiah. Because when the Messiah came, according to Jewish belief, a complete Social Darwinist order would be established and a hierarchy with Jews at the top would be established. This Messiah, whom the Jews were waiting for, actually reflected the Pharaoh described in the Qur’an. “The truth is that Pharaoh was arrogant in the land, and divided its people into sects. He made some of them weak, slaughtered their sons, and left their women alive. Indeed, he was one of the corrupters.” (Surat al-Kasas, 4) They were the perpetrators of the kind of corruption described in this verse. However, especially in recent years, it has become clear that the only important force opposing the philosophical foundations of the Order was Islam. Other religions and ideologies were willing to obey the New Secular Order and were far from a mindset that would criticize this Order. For this reason, the patrons of the Order, that is, the Israeli-oriented centres of power had chosen Islam and Muslims as their number one target. The fact that the attacks against Muslims in different parts of the world are always connected with Israel is clear proof of this.

This situation revealed that the strategic direction of the Messianic Plan was “that it requires a conflict between the Jewish Zionist-controlled Order and the Muslims”. What Samuel Huntington brought up as the “Clash of Civilizations” was based on the prediction of a major conflict between the West and Islamic civilization in the near future. The prophecies necessary for the coming of the Messiah have been formed one after another, and today there remains the reconstruction of the Temple of Solomon as a final prophecy that must be fulfilled. Kabbalist Hirsch Kalischer formulated political Zionism and as other Kabbalists agree, this is the last prophecy that the Jews must fulfil after capturing Jerusalem, and after it is done, the arrival of the Messiah will be a matter of time. This is the prophetic aspect of the Messianic Plan that confronts Muslims and Jews. Because according to the Zionists, for the construction of the Temple, two Islamic shrines that stand today in its former place; The destruction of the Al-Aqsa Masjid and the Kubbet-üs Sahra is necessary. This is an event that the Muslims of the world will never accept. As many experts who are interested in the subject say, the Israelis’ destruction of the Islamic shrines on the Temple Mount will most likely be the beginning of a conflict. Undoubtedly, our hope is that such a conflict will never occur and that both Jews and Muslims may find peace in the Holy Land.

Preparations for the Construction of the Zionist Temple were Accelerated!

On April 27, 1984, the existence of a rather interesting organization in Israel was revealed. Members of the organization named Machteret Yehudit (Jewish Gang) made a plan to blow up five passenger buses full of Arabs, but they were arrested at the last moment when the incident unfolded. However, there were important actions that have been done before; they carried out the assassination by placing bombs in two vehicles of Arab mayors in West Sheria in 1980, and in 1983 they attacked the Islamic College in Hebron, killing three students and wounding thirty-three of them. But soon it became clear that Machteret Yehudit was about to carry out a much bigger action than all this. The organization had prepared a very sophisticated plan to blow up two Islamic shrines located in East Jerusalem, which Muslims call the Harem-i Sharif, and Jews and Christians call the Temple Mount; the Al-Aqsa Masjid and the Kubbet-us Sahra (Dome of the Rock). A professional examination was carried out on the architectural structure of the shrines, and a large number of explosives were stolen from a military garrison in the Golan Heights. To blow up the Kubbet-us Sahra without damaging the surroundings, 28 separate explosives were to be placed in the designated places. If necessary, UZIs with silencers and tear gas bombs would be used to shoot unarmed Muslim guards tasked with protecting the Al-Aqsa Masjid. The operation was to be carried out with the participation of over twenty Machteret Yehudit militants.

Machteret Yehudit had two important leaders; Yeshua Ben-Shoshan and Yehuda Etzion. Israeli writer Ehud Sprinzak, while examining the identities of these two in the book “The Ascendance of Israel’s Radical Right”, drew attention to their being Kabbalists, especially the profound studies of Yeshua Ben-Shoshan, who could be considered the spiritual leader of the movement, on Kabbalah. Another common feature of these two Kabbalists was their commitment to Gush Emunim, the most important political organization of the Israeli radical right and the “party of Kabbalists.[1] Ehud Sprinzak explained that their leader Yeshua Ben-Shoshan’s Gush Emunim had brought up some issues that they believed in but found it inconvenient to say openly. Their main project was the one of the “Ideal State of Israel” to be established soon: Yeshua Ben-Shoshan emphasized that after the reconstruction of the Temple, Israel would turn into a Jewish theocracy, which would be governed by the Sanhedrin council, consisting of 70 wise Kabbalists. This is what the leaders of Gush also calculated, but they never found it appropriate to say it openly.[2]

In short, members of Machteret Yehudit had tried to do a task that everyone wanted to do at an inopportune time because of their impatience. Therefore, both Gush Emunim and the Israeli government looked at Machteret Yehudit and its activities with secret sympathy. The Israeli court naturally punished this act, which constitutes a crime according to the law, but the day after the court’s decision, Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir made the following statement to the members of Machteret Yehudit: “They are all wonderful people, but they made a mistake.” Rabbi Moshe Levinger, a leading figure of Gush Emunim, also commented that the action was theoretically correct, but wrong in terms of timing.[3] American Jewish journalist Robert Friedman wrote; “The Israeli government was involved in the Machteret Yehudit incident, but the extent of it will never be known”.[4] In 1985, an effective campaign was launched for the release of imprisoned Machteret Yehudit members. The most ardent supporters of the campaign were politicians who were members of the Knesset. A large number of Knesset members from all parties, even from the “leftist and secular” and supposedly pro-peace Workers’ Party, worked to get these “wonderful people” out of prison, as a result of which they were all released through one amnesty after another.

“Today, you can easily see the Jews’ work on this issue when you look down from the window of the Al-Aqsa Masjid in the direction of the mihrab… A large number of bulldozers and earthmoving vehicles are working in this area… While trying to take pictures of this excavation site, we saw a large number of Israeli soldiers moving towards the Al-Aqsa Masjid accompanied by an archaeologist with a white shirt on his head… They went under the Masjid through a gate. Now, we understood what Muslims who were praying in the Aqsa Masjid meant by the words they said to us, ‘these will destroy us together with Aqsa someday’… We want to go down to the excavation site and get information, but when they realize that we are Muslims, we are not even allowed to approach. Since Palestinian Muslims are also unable to enter this area, they do not know the size of the excavation and how much of the underneath of the Al-Aqsa Masjid has been carved. If Israel carries out a direct attack against the Al-Aqsa Masjid… it is afraid of Islamic countries taking a total front… (For this reason) They are trying to make it look like a historical digging so that it will collapse on its own. In this way, it will step back and will have reached its goal without taking any responsibility for it.”[5]

As for the destruction of Islamic shrines in Jerusalem for the construction of this Zionist Temple, Jews should not be thought to be alone. Their historical allies also shared the same thoughts as them on this issue. American Evangelicals, as usual, showed a “royalist attitude rather than a king” regarding the construction of the Temple and gave all kinds of support to Israel for this. The second most important man of the Jerusalem Temple Foundation general secretary was a former Stern terrorist named Stanley Goldfoot. In the 1940s, Goldfoot, who took action in the ranks of the Zionist terrorist organization Stern, taking place in such bloody acts like the bombing of King David Hotel, was one of the Jews who made great efforts for the construction of the Temple. But there was an interesting situation: Goldfoot was apparently an atheist and an unbeliever. But despite this, by showing verses from the Old Testament, he wrote and spoke out that, “Jerusalem belongs to the Jews and the presence of Muslim shrines here is unacceptable.” The Kabbalist Rabbi Shlomo Chaim Hacohen Aviner described the importance of the Zionist Temple as follows: “We must not forget that the gathering of exiles (bringing diaspora Jews to Israel) and the foundation of our state have only one sacred goal: the reconstruction of the Temple. At the top of the pyramid, there is a Temple.”[6]

The Jerusalem Temple Foundation was delivering the donations it collected from American Evangelicals to this Kabbalah centre. It was established that the foundation was in close contact with Machteret Yehudit, who was arrested in 1984 when he was about to blow up the Al-Aqsa Masjid. In fact, some of the lawyers of the Machteret Yehudit members who were later brought to court had their money covered by the foundation’s fund. In short, the Israeli attempts to demolish the Al-Aqsa Masjid were strongly supported by American evangelicals, numbering around 50 million. The fact that masonry, the other historical ally of the Jews, was also on the side of the Jews in this regard constituted another important dimension of the event. From the point of view of masonry, which based all its ideology, symbols and rituals on the Temple of Solomon, the reconstruction of the Temple was considered one of the greatest goals on earth. The issue was also discussed from time to time in masonic sources and it was emphasized that the reconstruction of the Zionist Temple was one of the main goals of the organization.

Undoubtedly, the Templars’ plan for the “Jerusalem of the Earth” in question was another reflection of the Messianic Plan carried out by the Kabbalists. And if the Templars and their modern versions, the masons, consider that “Jerusalem of the Earth” will begin in 2023, it should be considered normal for them to support Israel’s demolition of the Al-Aqsa Masjid with all their might. Because the key to the “Jerusalem of the Earth”, that is, the Messianic Jewish sovereignty that will spread from Jerusalem to the earth, depends on the reconstruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. Apart from the evangelical or Masonic groups, the Western world, which will engage into a “Clash of Civilizations” with Islam, unfortunately, also leans toward the idea of conflict in general. After all, it seems that the Israelis are preparing to demolish the Al-Aqsa Masjid at the “right time” and an explanation would be such like “it happened unintentionally” and then rebuild a copy of the old Temple in its place within a short time. At the Kabbalah lodge Ateret Cohanim in Jerusalem, it is also related to the fact that rehearsals of the ceremonies and rituals that are claimed to have been performed in the Temple during the time of Solomon are being held.

Now Mr R. Tayyip Erdoğan’s and the AKP government’s normalization steps with Israel, unfortunately, would facilitate these Evil goals of the Zionists. So, the enmity towards Abdulhamid from İYİ Party figures would benefit who?

The American archaeologist Gordon Franz, who has been working in Jerusalem for many years, has quoted the following based on his observations on the subject:

“If there is one thing I am sure of, it is that the Jews who are aiming to rebuild the Temple definitely want to demolish those two mosques. I have no definite idea how this destruction will happen, but it will happen soon. They will destroy the sanctities of Islam and build a Temple here in its place. I don’t know when or how it will be done, but it will be done.”[7]

Reverend James E. from the Second Baptist Church of Houston. DeLoach, on the other hand, emphasizes that all Jews want to demolish the masjids and build the Temple, but they will do it not by radical methods such as Machteret Yehudit, but in the way described in the news of Aksiyon magazine: “It’s a fact; all the Jews I knew wanted to see those masjids destroyed. But according to what they told me, this destruction would have happened by action from God, for example, an earthquake or something similar. But destruction by the outside intervention was also among the plans.”[8]

Last Words:

Those who have a grain of grace and mercy, please answer:

How should the actions of this “religious champion” Mr Erdoğan, who made normalization initiatives with Zionist Israel, and the İYİ Party executive team, who spat out their hostility of Sultan Abdulhamid, who was subjected to a deliberate smear campaign because he did not allow the establishment of Israel to be interpreted as if both of their actions were under the control of the same Zionist centres? Or how would the authorities respond to this situation?

     [1] Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, The Israeli Connection: Who Israeli Arms and Why, 1.b., New York: Pantheon Books 1987 p. 5.

     [2] Ibid.

     [3] Stephen Green, Taking Sides: America’s Secret Relations with a Militant Israel, New York: William Morrow and Company, 1984, p. 107-114.

     [4] Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, The Israeli Connection, p. 7.

     [5] E. A. Bayne, Four Ways of Politics, New York: American Universities Field Staff, 1965, p. 247.

     [6] Andrew Cockburn, Leslie Cockburn, Dangerous Liaison: The Inside Story of the U.S.-Israeli Covert Relationship, New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1991, p. 102.

     [7] Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, The Israeli Connection, p. 12.

     [8] Ibid., p. 16.