THE LINK BETWEEN ERGENEKON AND OPERATION ON IRAN AND CLOSURE BARGAINNING

Hadley: We are telling Iran how critical the situation is!
Stephen Hadley, Assistant to the U.S. President For National Security Affairs, paid a one-day visit to Ankara. He both delivered messages to Iran before talks in Geneva and held a confidential submit with security advisors of eleven NATO countries. This meeting at Ankara Palace was hosted by Prime Minister Erdoğan's foreign policy advisor Ahmet Davutoğlu. Hadley met President Abdullah Gül, Prime Minister Tayyip Erdoğan, Foreign Minister Ali Babacan and the Turkish deputy chief of General Staff Ergin Saygun. "William Burns, Secretary of State for Political Affairs, will go to Geneva to display the importance of our proposal and our diplomatic efforts, not for negotiations. We will not negotiate with Iran unless they give up uranium enrichment program" said Hadley.  

            How about Iranian submit in Ankara?

                          Stephen Hadley, Assistant to George Bush for National Security Affairs, paid a visit to Ankara. Hadley met the President, Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister. One day later, Iran Foreign Minister Mutteki appeared in Ankara. It is almost like an Iran summit in Ankara. So, what were the goals and the meaning of these visits?

            The crisis between Iran and the USA has never been so close to a war. It is unusual that in the same period a chance for a dialog emerged in a way that has never been so far; just  in a couple of days!!! And again in the same period, Turkey turned out to be a pivotal power in a way that it has never done so far. Now, Turkey was about to take an active role to ease the crisis between Iran and the USA.

While Iran claims "We can hit thirty two bases of the USA" and Italian PM Berlusconi says "Third world war breaks out if Iran is attacked"; while the name responsible for the USA missile systems warns: "Iran, in the near future, can hit even the USA", and while Israel keeps on provoking Washington, suddenly, a very important gathering is staged in Geneva for the nuclear studies of Iran and Tehran is promised that "do whatever you do want except for the uranium enrichment. Moreover, let us support you". Anyway, this is the reason for the crisis; Tehran wants to gain fuel independency in nuclear technology. However, this was not the importance of this gathering. The USA took part in the gathering; in fact the two sides were not talking but they were sitting at the same table.      

What was happening in the same period?

The USA thought about opening an office in Tehran and it was the first time that these two countries that haven't established diplomatic relations since 1980 and used Switzerland Embassy in Tehran got so closer. On the one hand, Iran has been continuing missile tests and big operations in Persian Gulf. On the other hand, Ahmadinejad stated that there might be direct negotiations between two countries as long as the USA did not impose a prerequisite. It was interesting that explanations for peace and for war could be made concurrently.    

Is that all? No, the real development was that;    Stephen Hadley, Assistant to George Bush for National Security Affairs, paid a visit to Ankara and met the President, Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister. One day later, Iran Foreign Minister Mutteki was invited to Ankara. That was nearly like an Iran summit in Ankara. Let's make this clear; Turkey mediated between Iran and the USA and played an alleged historic role.      

"As of now, it was essential to focus on Turkey, on the truths that we cold not realize due to today's chaotic atmosphere.

"Turkey has been gaining a regional power from the inside fundamental change in a more determined and successful way. It defined this expansion as "being the central country". It is closely into the issue in Lebanon and going into "close-knit" partnerships with Syria. It is establishing a dialog between Syria and Israel and making them come together in Istanbul to compromise. The ambassadors invited to Ankara are given information regarding this new process. According to the talks, there will soon be serious attempts for Russia, China and Middle East. The same Turkey is signing "integration" treaties with Iraq in every area and laying the foundations of every organization to work, so to speak, like a country. Turkey is planning to sign these treaties with all its neighbouring countries in the region.

Together with the opportunities in the transitional period of the world, it is not so difficult to achieve its goal for a country that intervenes in the crisis and proposes peace/dialog. And this goal is already determined as a "central country" but not a regional or a front country"

…said İbrahim Karagül, but I wonder whether he has ever taken into account the intention of the USA to use AKP as a subcontractor while laying traps for Iran.

Isn't he aware of the fact that AKP is a figurant in this scenario that was planned under the pretext of saying "We invited and warned you. We friendly reminded you of the things that had happened to you. But you were decisive to be obstinate." Or does he think this does not go with AKP?

Does he ever recall that the USA, during Iraq invasion, made use of Recep T. Erdoğan and his proponents with the same pretexts? Whereas, it has been written and said that exceptional attempts and guaranties were provided with the aim of preventing AKP from closing in return for giving support to the USA during a possible operation on Iran. How unfortunate! Because, AKP is not being closed but held hostage in all respects!

The USA to AKP: We promise you(r party) to survive in return for your support against Iran!

His name is Marc Parris. A former US ambassador to Turkey. Registered CIA manservant and a man of MOSSAD. Well, this Jew has nothing to do but giving messages!!!

His last statement was interesting; "the closure of AKP is less probable compared to one month ago…" That was totally a comedy show! So to speak, he was reaching a definite verdict from Washington for a case that had not been handled yet. Well, it is not the Washington Jewish lobbies but the Turkish court that will arrive at a verdict, how you dare to talk about it!!!    

What is more, the words of this man grab the headlines thanks to our Masonic media and the media presents it as a kind of document like "AKP will not be closed". Is this man a governor general? How can words of such a man make headlines!! Even this view was the indication that Turkey was indirectly colonized, wasn't it?  Disinformation must be something like that!!!

As for the analysis of the given message; our analyses is that the message of Marc Parris comprehends intervention in Iran. Paris hinted that if you stood by me during the intervention in Iran, I would not get AKP closed.[1] And as for now, these vultures that will attack Iran look as if they have won. And unfortunately, AKP proponents who got delighted because of "not getting closed" do not think about the troubles of accompanying Iran operation.    

We suppose the lobby (that advocates hitting Iran) has been defeated!..

"Washington has made a fundamental change in its policy and adopted, in the first place, a high-level negotiation with Tehran and assigning a long-term diplomat to Iran on condition that this negotiation achieves its aim.

The importance of the seized opportunity is better understood when it is thought that, throughout these nuclear talks, Iran always watched the USA closely and a sign for normalization in the mutual-relations was much more significant for Tehran than all other incentives or motives.    

We had better say that this opportunity, despite the lobby (that advocates hitting Iran) in Bush administration, was mainly seized thanks to the pressure of European Union.

It may also be said that: The trick of Javier Solana, EU High Representative for the Common Foreign Policy and Condoleezza Rice, The United States Secretary of State, turned out to be better than the trick played by Israeli Falcons and the neo-cons that are known to be on intimate terms with Vice President Dick Cheney." said Yasemin Çongar and she feels hopeful for nothing, we think. Because, what the Devil needs is blood.

De we count on American messages?

Parris, a former U.S. ambassador to Ankara, was speaking at a meeting on the Turkish crisis at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, or CSIS, in Washington…

Parris stated that the corruption which spread to AKP came out and, in this sense it is seen that AKP government is "sharing the same culture with its predecessors". After that, he said whether AKP upheld liberal democracy or not led to some question marks in minds. He emphasized that although showing reverse tendencies in the last month, Liberalism and the West sympathizers had thoughts like "we are against closing parties but this time it is all right".  He worded that Kemalists, some of whom are apt to violence, would be marginalized through reforms… He specified that there were different colours in the military and the retired officers might take political roles more than it used to be by giving the example of Hilmi Özkök.   

Parries pointed out that "3. Powers" (his own words) were strong in the police and they could influence the prosecutors. And he continued: "I have no idea whether they act in behalf of Erdoğan. Yet, they do no want to see the winning of those who wanted to topple Erdoğan." And the poor Mehmet Altan still believes in the USA and Jewish Lobbies. Whereas, due to these policies, AKP is preparing a tragic end not only for itself but also for America.   

We already know that Mahir Kaynak, a former specialist in the National Intelligence Organization, adores the super powers! He says:

"What is reflected to the people in a war remains limited to the information about the clashes. The sides narrate victories of their own troops, bravery of their soldiers and the how close the ultimate goal is. Observing these, we cannot understand the course of a fight. But the concrete achievements of one side, that's the areas captured, make a sense.    

The cause of a war, generally, is different than the told one. The reason given is a kind of shallow one that reflects the emotions of an ordinary person and it definitely makes the other side unfair. That's to say; every clash takes place between sides both of which are fair or unfair.

Plenty of info and documents have been delivered from the Ergenekon front, but we have no idea about their headquarters.  This incident is presented us as detection and the judgement of those who get involved in illegal actions. While some part of the media is telling us about the dark scenarios, the other part is trying to explain that the indictments are unfounded by saying that the person proclaimed as financier died penniless.

Our first question to answer is "whether this incident consists of deciphering an illegal network or not". If so, our position can be likened to the interest that we show in a controversial case of murder.  We can be curious about the result, but this result won't be minded since it will not have an effect on our life.

If there is a politic fight that will affect everyone and if the illicit activities are made up of the skirmish arenas of this fight, then we need to know what is going on at the headquarters. It means while one of the sides are bringing up the illicit organizations to the agenda, the other one, if it can gets the initiative, is getting ready to make allegations about the corruption files. We will either face the incident in an illegal aspect or go into the headquarters and figure out how the battle is being conducted.            

The incident is political, but this does not mean that "it has nothing to do with law and the indictments propounded are based on false scenarios" it is just a case that  some relations or contacts  known for years have been revealed and taken to the jurisdiction. Jurisdiction has to finalize this issue that has been brought to them but the process hasn't been started by the jurisdiction.

The stage that we have been through can be perceived as "declaration of a war by one side on the other one". The photographs we saw were taken at the front and those in the photograph are not so strong to change the course of this country. They are like soldiers and officers at the front. Taking the commander of the front as a hostage is a big success; yet it isn't big enough to publicize the result." After these philosophical views, Kaynak is finalizing his words by reminding that despite "the multi-national global powers", that's Zionism, nothing would be able to done to be successful. It is already known that this is his mission.

"Headquarters are always multi-national; that means, the clashes occur between the blocs not the countries. You need to pass through dark and well-protected corridors in order to reach these headquarters. Another way is also to evaluate what kind of decisions are made here and we have no other way

To summarise my present assessment: elimination of the wing called nationalist shouldn't be considered as the victory of the other. The real intention is to do away with the nationalists and, as a consequence of this, make the globalism unnecessary. (Probably, he wanted to say "Moderate Islamists and Masonic nationalists are under the guidance of external centres. How unfortunate! The fight and disagreement between them will reinforce the national front." and he also complained about it. M.Ç.)   

A game has two sides/dimensions: the first one is the effects of the results and the other is the excitement of watching this game. In fact, It is exciting to watch how anti-nationalists are eliminating themselves"[2] These words of Kaynak are recommending that AKP submit to the USA protection and take the role of a subcontractor and, in this way, guarantee itself. 

We are approaching our holy goal despite everything.

As a necessity of my belief and religion, I have never been pessimistic about the future; I can't and I won't be. Otherwise, I think I may walk out of the faith line. Heaven forbid! 

You know why I am so hopeful? You know why I am so persistent? 

Fain would they extinguish Allah's Light with their mouths, but Allah will not allow but that His Light should be perfected, even though the Unbelievers may detest (it).  (Sura: Al-Tauba – 32 ).

Thus, Allah's Light will be perfected…

I would like to share another reason for this with you;

"We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly guard it (from corruption)." (Sura: Al-Hijr – 9).

Through our own faith and understanding, we analyse this verse of the Koran in the following way:

Amongst the most heartfelt and the strongest guards of Quran, Turks are at the front lines. They have a significant place. In the civilizations that they founded, Turks have always respected and protected the Holy Quran. They have tried to prevent the Quran from every kind of insult and treachery. It means: Quran will exist until the Judgement Day unless Turks lose their loyalty and respect for It. And we don't have the slightest doubt about it.

We consider "Ergenekon" investigation to be an external intervention…    

[1] Sebahattin Önkibar / Yeniçağ

[2] Star